Report: Americans on hantavirus-stricken cruise ship to be quarantined in Nebraska 30%

By Katherine Mosack0%

5/9/2026, 10:33:29 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Framing Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 44.4% saturation with 299 hits. Analysis detected 1,046 faulty-reasoning hits from 674 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 40% and a BS Rank of 30% (14,416 of 20,371 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 70.80% of the article peer group.

This aerial view shows health personnel boarding the cruise ship MV Hondius, while stationary off the port of Praia, the capital of Cape Verde, on May 6, 2026. 
Evacuations were taking place on May 6, 2026 from a cruise ship stricken with a deadly outbreak of hantavirus, the World Health Organization said, as experts confirmed a rare strain that can be transmitted between humans. 
Three people, two crew members and one other person, thought to be infected with the virus were being taken off the MV Hondius, anchored off Cape Verde, the WHO said. 
(Photo by AFP via Getty Images) 
OAN Staff Katherine Mosack 
10:33 AM  Saturday, May 9, 2026 
As Spanish authorities prepare to evacuate the hantavirus-stricken M/V Hondius cruise ship, the U.S. 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is reportedly sending staff to the Canary Islands to accompany American passengers on a chartered flight to be quarantined in Nebraska. 
The vessel is expected to arrive at the port of Granadilla, Tenerife, one of the Spanish Canary Islands, “in the early hours of Sunday,” where all guests and some crew members will disembark, the ship’s Dutch operator, Oceanwide Expeditions, reported on Saturday. 
The company also reported that there were no longer any symptomatic individuals on board the cruise ship. 
“The atmosphere on board continues to remain positive,” Oceanwide Expeditions stated, despite three people having died on the ship since the outbreak. 
Two Spanish passengers who spoke to the Associated Press on the condition of anonymity said that their time on the ship has been generally calm. 
Some people have been bird-watching, while others gather in common areas while social distancing and wearing masks to read or attend talks. 
The CDC reported that it was sending a team of epidemiologists and medical professionals to the Canary Islands to conduct exposure risk assessments for each American passenger. 
They are also expected to collaborate with health officials from around the world to repatriate the 147 passengers and 60 crew members, including 17 Americans, to 24 different countries. 
“The U.S. government’s top priority is the safe repatriation of American passengers,” the CDC emphasized in a statement on Friday. 
“These individuals are planned to be evacuated on a U.S. government medical repatriation flight to Offutt Air Force Base in Omaha, Nebraska, where they will be transported to the National Quarantine Center at the University of Nebraska, Omaha.” 
Nebraska is home to both the federally supported National Quarantine Unit and the Nebraska Biocontainment Unit, to prevent possible spread of the virus within the U.S. 
“Nebraska Medicine and UNMC (University of Nebraska Medical Center) remain in close coordination with national partners regarding the evolving situation with the hantavirus outbreak on the MV Hondius cruise ship,” Nebraska Medicine said in a statement to CNN. 
“We cannot discuss specific communications at this time, but, our specialized teams, including the Nebraska Biocontainment Unit and National Quarantine Unit, are staffed and ready, if needed, to safely provide care while protecting our staff and the community.” 
Hantavirus is usually spread through encounters with rodent droppings, urine, or saliva. 
It is a rare disease, though it can be deadly if not treated right away. 
Health officials have speculated that the outbreak on the Hondius ship may be the Andes variant, the only strain of hantavirus that has been known to spread between humans. 
However, the CDC and the World Health Organization (WHO) maintain that the risk to the wider public, including the United States, from the outbreak is low. 
“The risk remains absolutely low,” WHO spokesman Christian Lindmeier said. 
“This is not a new COVID.” 
The CDC issued this Health Alert Network (HAN) Health Advisory to inform clinicians and health departments about the hantavirus disease cases caused by infection with Andes virus. 
The risk to the public’s health in the United States is considered extremely low at this time. 
As a… pic.twitter.com/zfwl2BhzRm 
 CDC (@CDCgov) May 9, 2026 
Stay informed! 
Receive breaking news blasts directly to your inbox for free. 
Subscribe here. https://www.oann.com/alerts 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 8.0%Katherine Mosack: 5.9%One America News Network: 4.6%Confirmation Bias8.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 1.9%One America News Network: 2.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 13.4%Katherine Mosack: 3.5%One America News Network: 3.9%Availability Heuristic13.4%This article: 4.3%Katherine Mosack: 0.7%One America News Network: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic4.3%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.3%One America News Network: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 5.6%Katherine Mosack: 3.7%One America News Network: 2.9%Overconfidence Bias5.6%This article: 15.3%Katherine Mosack: 16.3%One America News Network: 15.3%Framing Effect15.3%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.8%One America News Network: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.9%Katherine Mosack: 0.7%One America News Network: 1.1%Status Quo Bias3.9%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 16.2%Katherine Mosack: 4.0%One America News Network: 4.3%Optimism Bias16.2%This article: 2.2%Katherine Mosack: 1.5%One America News Network: 1.8%Pessimism Bias2.2%This article: 3.7%Katherine Mosack: 15.0%One America News Network: 11.8%Negativity Bias3.7%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 3.6%One America News Network: 3.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 3.4%One America News Network: 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.3%One America News Network: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 4.9%One America News Network: 3.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 5.1%One America News Network: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 8.9%Katherine Mosack: 4.6%One America News Network: 5.3%Halo Effect8.9%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.8%One America News Network: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 1.3%One America News Network: 2.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.7%One America News Network: 0.7%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.2%One America News Network: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 4.6%One America News Network: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.5%One America News Network: 0.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 44.4%Katherine Mosack: 5.9%One America News Network: 6.3%Appeal to Authority44.4%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 2.5%One America News Network: 1.8%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 1.5%One America News Network: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.2%One America News Network: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 5.8%One America News Network: 5.4%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.4%One America News Network: 0.5%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 1.5%One America News Network: 1.1%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 11.3%One America News Network: 10.0%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 3.2%One America News Network: 1.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 3.3%One America News Network: 3.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.6%One America News Network: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 3.9%Katherine Mosack: 0.4%One America News Network: 0.2%Appeal to Nature3.9%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.5%One America News Network: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 7.0%Katherine Mosack: 1.0%One America News Network: 1.6%Anecdotal7.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 5.2%Katherine Mosack: 1.6%One America News Network: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.2%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 5.6%Katherine Mosack: 0.4%One America News Network: 0.3%Special Pleading5.6%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 1.6%One America News Network: 0.7%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.0%Katherine Mosack: 2.0%One America News Network: 1.7%Unattributed Quote4.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 1.5%One America News Network: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 6.3%One America News Network: 5.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 1.5%Katherine Mosack: 1.7%One America News Network: 1.1%Indoctrination1.5%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 1.2%One America News Network: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 3.3%One America News Network: 3.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 2.2%Katherine Mosack: 1.0%One America News Network: 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…2.2%

674 words analyzed.

Speakers

7speakers62%attributed speech253writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWorld Health Organization • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWorld Health Organization • 30 words • 0.0% coverageAFP • 6 words • 0.0% coverageKatherine Mosack • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) • 28 words • 0.0% coverageOceanwide Expeditions • 42 words • 0.0% coverageOceanwide Expeditions • 17 words • 0.0% coverageOceanwide Expeditions • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) • 20 words • 0.0% coverageCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageNebraska Medicine • 38 words • 0.0% coverageNebraska Medicine • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) • 26 words • 0.0% coverageChristian Lindmeier • 10 words • 0.0% coverageChristian Lindmeier • 6 words • 0.0% coverageCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Nebraska Medicine

100%flagged-word coverage
76 attributed words18% of attributed speech69% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -5.9 ptsWriter: 5.9%Nebraska Medicine: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-4.0 ptsWriter: 4.0%Nebraska Medicine: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.