Keyword summary
â 75% 17 analyzed articles/videos 11,185 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nebraska results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 6,387 hits . Analysis detected 43,365 faulty-reasoning hits from 46,941 analyzed words across 17 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of â 18% (29,890 of 36,315 keywords). This Nebraska is better (less manipulative) than 82.30% of the peer group. Nebraska
Keyword details
Total words: 46,941
Article count: 17
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.7% percentile 1.8% BS Score17 analyzed articles46.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 12.1% 12.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.6% 13.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 11.0% 11.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst