Author summary
23%1 analyzed article/video722 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anila Yoganathan results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Indoctrination, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 298 hits. Analysis detected 1,838 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,888 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 46% (3,444 of 6,316 authors). This Anila Yoganathan is better (less manipulative) than 54.50% of the peer group.
Anila Yoganathan
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
46%Anila Yoganathan (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,888
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

46% percentile
025507510045.5% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 10.3%10.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.1%8.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.8%1.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 5.6%5.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.4%4.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 6.7%6.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 10.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Author 5.6%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Red Herring: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos