Raw Story⁠93%

GOP lawmaker showered with boos from angry town hall attendees for supporting Trump bill ⁠79%

By Bennito L. Kelty⁠84%

7/7/2026, 5:38:28 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 17 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Framing Effect, and Unattributed Quote, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 45.3% saturation with 141 hits. Analysis detected 1,020 faulty-reasoning hits from 311 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 69.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (4,795 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 78.10% of the article peer group.

A GOP lawmaker was heckled and booed by angry town hall attendees because of his support for President Donald Trump's signature bill, according to reports. 
Rep. 
Mike Flood (R-NE) was "drowned with boos" after he touted voting for the Big Beautiful Bill during a town hall in Nebraska, according to a post on X by American Bridge 21st Century, a Democratic super PAC and opposition-research group. 
A video accompanying the post showed that Flood was asked what he would do to support benefits for people with disabilities. 
He answered by talking about the Big Beautiful Bill, which Trump pushed through Congress last year. 
Flood claimed the bill "protected Medicaid." 
As soon as Flood said the words "Big Beautiful Bill," the crowd could be heard showering him with boos. 
Flood waited for the boos to die down before trying to argue that the bill saved benefits that "would not have been available for the developmentally disabled, the persistently mentally ill, people that are of advanced age," and with each one, the crescendo of boos swelled again. 
When Flood repeated, "We protected Medicaid in a common-sense, bipartisan way," the boos became even louder, and people in the audience could be heard yelling at him. 
Journalist Em Luetkemeyer also reported on Flood's town hall and noted that "constituents are yelling" when he talked about his support for voter ID laws. 
Luetkemeyer noted that a man from Omaha "yelled" a question into the microphone, asking, "When are you going to call up President Trump before he bankrupts this country?" 
Flood was in Bellevue, Nebraska, according to his congressional office. 
However, he's also faced hostile crowds in previous months while hosting town halls in Columbus and Norfolk, which, along with Bellevue, are all in red Nebraska counties that Trump won in 2024. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.1%Bennito L. Kelty: 12.0%Rawstory: 8.4%Confirmation Bias6.1%This article: 0.0%Bennito L. Kelty: 0.8%Rawstory: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 20.9%Bennito L. Kelty: 3.5%Rawstory: 4.5%Availability Heuristic20.9%This article: 10.3%Bennito L. Kelty: 0.8%Rawstory: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic10.3%This article: 0.0%Bennito L. Kelty: 1.2%Rawstory: 1.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bennito L. Kelty: 2.5%Rawstory: 2.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 34.4%Bennito L. Kelty: 11.4%Rawstory: 13.4%Framing Effect34.4%This article: 0.0%Bennito L. Kelty: 0.2%Rawstory: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Bennito L. Kelty: 0.1%Rawstory: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bennito L. Kelty: 0.0%Rawstory: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Bennito L. Kelty: 0.3%Rawstory: 0.7%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bennito L. Kelty: 2.7%Rawstory: 2.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 45.3%Bennito L. Kelty: 18.4%Rawstory: 21.6%Negativity Bias45.3%This article: 0.0%Bennito L. Kelty: 1.5%Rawstory: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bennito L. Kelty: 3.6%Rawstory: 2.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Bennito L. Kelty: 0.1%Rawstory: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bennito L. Kelty: 0.5%Rawstory: 2.5%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bennito L. Kelty: 0.0%Rawstory: 1.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bennito L. Kelty: 0.1%Rawstory: 0.6%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Bennito L. Kelty: 0.8%Rawstory: 0.9%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Bennito L. Kelty: 0.0%Rawstory: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Bennito L. Kelty: 0.7%Rawstory: 1.8%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bennito L. Kelty: 0.5%Rawstory: 0.7%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Bennito L. Kelty: 0.0%Rawstory: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bennito L. Kelty: 2.6%Rawstory: 6.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Bennito L. Kelty: 0.2%Rawstory: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 12.9%Bennito L. Kelty: 4.9%Rawstory: 4.1%Appeal to Authority12.9%This article: 0.0%Bennito L. Kelty: 1.6%Rawstory: 3.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Bennito L. Kelty: 1.1%Rawstory: 1.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Bennito L. Kelty: 0.9%Rawstory: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 10.3%Bennito L. Kelty: 6.9%Rawstory: 12.1%Hasty Generalization10.3%This article: 0.0%Bennito L. Kelty: 0.5%Rawstory: 0.7%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Bennito L. Kelty: 0.0%Rawstory: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 26.4%Bennito L. Kelty: 7.5%Rawstory: 9.2%Appeal to Emotion26.4%This article: 0.0%Bennito L. Kelty: 1.7%Rawstory: 1.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 29.9%Bennito L. Kelty: 9.3%Rawstory: 3.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)29.9%This article: 0.0%Bennito L. Kelty: 0.0%Rawstory: 0.6%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Bennito L. Kelty: 2.4%Rawstory: 1.7%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Bennito L. Kelty: 0.0%Rawstory: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Bennito L. Kelty: 0.0%Rawstory: 0.5%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 35.7%Bennito L. Kelty: 3.5%Rawstory: 3.9%Anecdotal35.7%This article: 0.0%Bennito L. Kelty: 0.0%Rawstory: 0.3%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 1.9%Bennito L. Kelty: 3.0%Rawstory: 2.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)1.9%This article: 0.0%Bennito L. Kelty: 0.0%Rawstory: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Bennito L. Kelty: 0.0%Rawstory: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Bennito L. Kelty: 0.0%Rawstory: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Bennito L. Kelty: 0.0%Rawstory: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Bennito L. Kelty: 0.0%Rawstory: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 30.5%Bennito L. Kelty: 8.9%Rawstory: 5.3%Unattributed Quote30.5%This article: 12.9%Bennito L. Kelty: 4.3%Rawstory: 4.1%Quote-first Misdirection12.9%This article: 10.6%Bennito L. Kelty: 9.5%Rawstory: 15.7%Biased Writer Voice10.6%This article: 0.0%Bennito L. Kelty: 1.1%Rawstory: 3.2%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 12.9%Bennito L. Kelty: 7.6%Rawstory: 8.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias12.9%This article: 18.3%Bennito L. Kelty: 0.9%Rawstory: 1.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias18.3%This article: 8.7%Bennito L. Kelty: 1.3%Rawstory: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…8.7%

311 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers46%attributed speech169writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageAmerican Bridge 21st Century • 40 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageMike Flood • 16 words • 0.0% coverageMike Flood • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 47 words • 100.0% coverageMike Flood • 27 words • 100.0% coverageEm Luetkemeyer • 25 words • 0.0% coverageEm Luetkemeyer • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
40 attributed words28% of attributed speech81% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%American Bridge 21st Century: 100.0%100.0%Politically Left Leaning B+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%American Bridge 21st Century: 100.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote-36.1 ptsWriter: 36.1%American Bridge 21st Century: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -33.7 ptsWriter: 33.7%American Bridge 21st Century: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-19.5 ptsWriter: 19.5%American Bridge 21st Century: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.