AP News⁠53%

2026 Nebraska U.S. House Primary Election Live Results ⁠1%

By HUMERA LODHI⁠0% MAYA SWEEDLER⁠0% EUNICE ESOMONU⁠0% SIMRAN PARWANI⁠0% HYOJIN YOO⁠0% DAN KEMPTON⁠0% PABLO BARRIA URENDA⁠0% LINDA GORMAN⁠0% KATIE MARRINER⁠0%

5/11/2026, 5:26:13 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 0 faulty reasoning types, including no named faulty reasoning patterns yet, with no single egregious example has been isolated yet. Analysis detected 0 faulty-reasoning hits from 70 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (21,869 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 99.90% of the article peer group.

Nebraska U.S. 
House primary results 
Polls are closed in Nebraska. 
Results will be updated as they come in. 
District 1 
Republican Primary 
Mike Flood (i) 
Uncontested 
Democratic Primary 
Eric Moyer 
Chris Backemeyer 
District 2 
Brinker Harding (i) 
Van Argyrakis 
John Cavanaugh 
Crystal Rhoades 
Kishla Askins 
Denise Powell 
James Leuschen 
Melanie Williams 
District 3 
David P. 
Huebner 
Adrian Smith (i) 
Becky Kelly Stille 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%HUMERA LODHI: 0.0%AP News: 2.0%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%HUMERA LODHI: 0.0%AP News: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%HUMERA LODHI: 0.0%AP News: 2.7%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%HUMERA LODHI: 0.0%AP News: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%HUMERA LODHI: 0.0%AP News: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%HUMERA LODHI: 0.0%AP News: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%HUMERA LODHI: 0.0%AP News: 8.0%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%HUMERA LODHI: 0.0%AP News: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%HUMERA LODHI: 0.0%AP News: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%HUMERA LODHI: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%HUMERA LODHI: 0.0%AP News: 2.2%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%HUMERA LODHI: 0.0%AP News: 2.1%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%HUMERA LODHI: 0.0%AP News: 9.6%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%HUMERA LODHI: 0.0%AP News: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%HUMERA LODHI: 0.0%AP News: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%HUMERA LODHI: 0.0%AP News: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%HUMERA LODHI: 0.0%AP News: 1.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%HUMERA LODHI: 0.0%AP News: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%HUMERA LODHI: 0.0%AP News: 1.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%HUMERA LODHI: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%HUMERA LODHI: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%HUMERA LODHI: 0.0%AP News: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%HUMERA LODHI: 0.0%AP News: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%HUMERA LODHI: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%HUMERA LODHI: 0.0%AP News: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%HUMERA LODHI: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%HUMERA LODHI: 0.0%AP News: 3.7%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%HUMERA LODHI: 0.0%AP News: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%HUMERA LODHI: 0.0%AP News: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%HUMERA LODHI: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%HUMERA LODHI: 0.0%AP News: 2.5%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%HUMERA LODHI: 0.0%AP News: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%HUMERA LODHI: 0.0%AP News: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%HUMERA LODHI: 0.0%AP News: 4.7%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%HUMERA LODHI: 0.0%AP News: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%HUMERA LODHI: 0.0%AP News: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%HUMERA LODHI: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%HUMERA LODHI: 0.0%AP News: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%HUMERA LODHI: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%HUMERA LODHI: 0.0%AP News: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%HUMERA LODHI: 0.0%AP News: 1.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%HUMERA LODHI: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%HUMERA LODHI: 0.0%AP News: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%HUMERA LODHI: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%HUMERA LODHI: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%HUMERA LODHI: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%HUMERA LODHI: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%HUMERA LODHI: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%HUMERA LODHI: 0.0%AP News: 2.0%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%HUMERA LODHI: 0.0%AP News: 1.2%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%HUMERA LODHI: 0.0%AP News: 3.1%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%HUMERA LODHI: 0.0%AP News: 0.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%HUMERA LODHI: 0.0%AP News: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%HUMERA LODHI: 0.0%AP News: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%HUMERA LODHI: 0.0%AP News: 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

70 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.