OutKick88%

The NFL Draft continues to be one of the worst 'sporting events' of the year 96%

By Ian Miller0%

4/23/2026, 9:33:51 PM

Topics: Sports

BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and False Dilemma, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 67.1% saturation with 401 hits. Analysis detected 1,881 faulty-reasoning hits from 598 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 93% and a BS Rank of 96% (956 of 20,452 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 95.30% of the article peer group.

The 2026 NFL Draft starts on Thursday evening in Pittsburgh, and just as it always is, it’s going to be some of the most boring television of the year. 
That might sound like sacrilege, because the NFL is beyond criticism for many sports fans, but the draft is the ideal example of what the league has become and the importance of gambling to modern audiences. 
For most "sporting events" there’s some assumption of competition, a reasonable belief that there will be action once every 20-30 seconds, and something worth watching in person. 
The NFL Draft is none of those things. 
TRADES COULD SAVE NFL DRAF, WHICH LACKS MULTIPLE FRANCHISE QB AND POLARIZING PLAYERS, FROM BEING A YAWNER 
Instead, we're "treated" to a three day-long press conference, stretched out beyond any and all possible justification in order to get television ratings. 
NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell walks out, gets booed, rinse and repeat. 
And the fact that people pay money to stand around for four hours, or more, to watch a press conference is a remarkable testament to sports fans’ willingness to be bored as long as football is tangentially involved. 
NFL Draft is an overblown mess 
One of the simplest ways to understand how absurd the NFL’s dominance has become is that nearly 14 million people tuned in to watch the draft in 2025. 
Hours upon hours of "analysts" repeating themselves with every player. 
So and so has a great "wingspan." 
This player runs a good 40-yard dash. 
Another one put some quality reps on "tape." 
Such and such has a high "motor." 
It’s mind-boggling that 14 million people are willing to subject themselves to this, all while claiming other sports are "boring." 
This is one of the most watched television events of the year. 
To see players announced and introduced after 10 minutes of pointless waiting and camera shots of team executives sitting around a table looking at laptops before clapping after every decision. 
ZERO BS. 
JUST DAKICH. 
TAKE THE DON'T @ ME PODCAST ON THE ROAD. 
DOWNLOAD NOW! 
It’s abundantly clear that gambling plays a huge role in this, as prediction markets and widespread sports betting apps have made anything "exciting" because there’s money involved. 
Then there’s the other side of it, while many NFL draft picks do pan out, even in the first round, there’s a significant number who never pan out. 
In the 2021 NFL Draft, for example, five years later, busts include Zach Wilson, Trey Lance, Mac Jones, Jaycee Horn, and Caleb Farley. 
There were stars to come out of that first round, like Ja’Marr Chase and Micah Parsons. 
But again, this is the first round. 
Not the second and third day. 
Second and third day! 
My goodness. 257 picks, and it takes three days, an endless slog of interminable hours to get through. 
How does anyone tolerate this? 
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP 
The NFL Draft is the best example of how the league has weaponized the importance of gambling to become the country’s most popular sport. 
More people will watch a press conference, because they have money on it, than a playoff game in another sport where things actually happen and there are important stakes. 
We don’t have to pretend the draft is worth watching. 
We just don’t. 
You can follow along on a website while watching actual sports. 
Or doing literally anything else. 
And you'll have the same experience, while avoiding the boredom and repetition of the worst "sporting event" of the year. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 13.4%Ian Miller: 11.4%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias13.4%This article: 1.2%Ian Miller: 1.3%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias1.2%This article: 8.5%Ian Miller: 3.7%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic8.5%This article: 4.5%Ian Miller: 0.9%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic4.5%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 1.1%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.3%Ian Miller: 5.8%Fox Nation: 3.1%Overconfidence Bias0.3%This article: 7.7%Ian Miller: 10.7%Fox Nation: 12.0%Framing Effect7.7%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 4.8%Ian Miller: 0.7%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias4.8%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 1.7%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 10.0%Ian Miller: 2.3%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias10.0%This article: 57.0%Ian Miller: 14.9%Fox Nation: 10.9%Negativity Bias57.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 1.5%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 6.4%Ian Miller: 3.7%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error6.4%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 4.2%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 2.7%Fox Nation: 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 3.3%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 1.4%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.8%Ian Miller: 2.2%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias3.8%This article: 4.7%Ian Miller: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect4.7%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 6.4%Ian Miller: 3.1%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem6.4%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 1.9%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 2.3%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 17.2%Ian Miller: 3.1%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma17.2%This article: 3.8%Ian Miller: 0.8%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope3.8%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 24.9%Ian Miller: 13.0%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization24.9%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 0.9%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 3.3%Ian Miller: 1.0%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon3.3%This article: 12.5%Ian Miller: 6.3%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion12.5%This article: 10.5%Ian Miller: 2.0%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question10.5%This article: 12.4%Ian Miller: 4.2%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)12.4%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 1.6%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 11.0%Ian Miller: 2.1%Fox Nation: 2.3%Anecdotal11.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 10.9%Ian Miller: 1.1%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)10.9%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 0.7%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 1.3%Fox Nation: 1.7%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 1.1%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 67.1%Ian Miller: 16.5%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice67.1%This article: 8.5%Ian Miller: 0.8%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination8.5%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 4.3%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.5%Ian Miller: 1.6%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.5%

598 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker1.8%attributed speech587writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageRoger Goodell • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Roger Goodell

100%flagged-word coverage
11 attributed words100% of attributed speech99% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice+33.6 ptsWriter: 66.4%Roger Goodell: 100.0%100.0%Indoctrination-8.7 ptsWriter: 8.7%Roger Goodell: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -3.6 ptsWriter: 3.6%Roger Goodell: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.