OutKick87%

Knicks parade attendee who dumped trash on sidewalk identified as JPMorgan Chase DEI exec, promptly fired 43%

By Ian Miller0%

6/24/2026, 3:13:36 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 28 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23.4% saturation with 112 hits. Analysis detected 1,015 faulty-reasoning hits from 479 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 46.8% and a BS Rank of 43% (11,736 of 20,370 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 57.60% of the article peer group.

The New York Knicks winning the NBA Finals was a tremendous accomplishment for the organization and its players, while also bringing a joyous end to the team's long championship drought for fans. 
It was also an excuse for those same fans to engage in some, well, typically New York behavior in the aftermath and celebrations. 
Particularly during the celebratory parade that went down the city's "Canyon of Heroes" corridor on June 18. 
Fans climbed atop cars, garbage trucks and just about any elevated surface for a better view. 
But nobody attracted more attention than a woman who spotted a Knicks-colored trash can and promptly dumped its contents onto the street. 
KNICKS FANS CLIMB ON POLICE CARS, SANITATION TRUCKS; COUNTLESS OTHERS UNABLE TO GET INTO JAM-PACKED PARADE 
It exemplified everything wrong with sports fans being unable to behave themselves during celebrations and parades. 
And it turns out the woman responsible exemplifies everything wrong with corporate diversity, equity and inclusion culture. 
On Tuesday night, the New York Post reported that the woman had been identified as Angie Baez, a 40-year-old financial industry executive. 
Seriously. 
The Post's report identified her LinkedIn profile, listing her as "Executive Director of Community and Industry Engagement for Card and Connected Commerce at JPMorgan Chase." 
Her previous work included serving as "Executive Director of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion" at The Infatuation, a website which reviews restaurants and neighborhood activities. 
Chase purchased the site in 2021 to grow its portfolio of lifestyle-based content for cardholders. 
ZERO BS. 
JUST DAKICH. 
TAKE THE DON'T @ ME PODCAST ON THE ROAD. 
DOWNLOAD NOW! 
The Post then contacted JPMorgan Chase, which confirmed that Baez had been fired, saying in a statement, "This employee is no longer with the company." 
Her bio on The Infatuation's website originally stated that her "efforts have helped position [The Infatuation] as a trailblazer in the pursuit of a more equitable and relatable food media industry." 
It has since been removed from the site. 
"As a vibrant mosaic of Dominican heritage, Bronx roots, and a passion for storytelling, creativity, and culture, Angie continues to lead the way towards a more inclusive and equitable future for food media," it read, per the Post. 
She also had prior work experience in similar capacities at Squarespace and Saks Fifth Avenue. 
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP 
This is the perfect example of the contradictions of DEI. 
Her job is supposedly to promote equity and tolerance. 
In her personal life, she acts like this. 
Dumping trash out on the sidewalk for someone else to deal with, because she wanted to steal public property. 
It's not equity, it's entitlement. 
And now she's been punished for it. 
Though knowing how the industry works, she'll be back to lecturing others on inclusion and equity in no time. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 22.1%Ian Miller: 11.4%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias22.1%This article: 1.9%Ian Miller: 1.3%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias1.9%This article: 8.1%Ian Miller: 3.7%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic8.1%This article: 6.7%Ian Miller: 0.9%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic6.7%This article: 1.5%Ian Miller: 1.1%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias1.5%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 5.8%Fox Nation: 3.1%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 3.3%Ian Miller: 10.7%Fox Nation: 12.0%Framing Effect3.3%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 0.7%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 1.7%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 4.0%Ian Miller: 2.3%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias4.0%This article: 21.3%Ian Miller: 14.9%Fox Nation: 10.9%Negativity Bias21.3%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 1.5%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 1.7%Ian Miller: 3.7%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error1.7%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 4.8%Ian Miller: 4.2%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias4.8%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 2.7%Fox Nation: 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 3.3%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 1.4%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.9%Ian Miller: 2.2%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias1.9%This article: 6.5%Ian Miller: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect6.5%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 1.7%Ian Miller: 3.1%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem1.7%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 1.9%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 15.0%Ian Miller: 2.3%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority15.0%This article: 1.0%Ian Miller: 3.1%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma1.0%This article: 4.0%Ian Miller: 0.8%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope4.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 21.1%Ian Miller: 13.0%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization21.1%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 0.9%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 1.0%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 7.1%Ian Miller: 6.3%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion7.1%This article: 1.9%Ian Miller: 2.0%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question1.9%This article: 10.2%Ian Miller: 4.2%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)10.2%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 1.6%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 3.1%Ian Miller: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division3.1%This article: 16.9%Ian Miller: 2.1%Fox Nation: 2.3%Anecdotal16.9%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.9%Ian Miller: 1.1%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.9%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 0.7%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 1.3%Fox Nation: 1.7%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 7.9%Ian Miller: 1.1%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection7.9%This article: 23.4%Ian Miller: 16.5%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice23.4%This article: 4.0%Ian Miller: 0.8%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination4.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Miller: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.5%Ian Miller: 4.3%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias3.5%This article: 4.4%Ian Miller: 1.6%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…4.4%

479 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.