Topic summary
81% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,084 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Corporate Culture results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 24.8% saturation with 3,074 hits . Analysis detected 19,200 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,420 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 56% (6,951 of 15,753 topics). This Corporate Culture is worse (more manipulative) than 55.90% of the peer group. Corporate Culture
Topic details
Total words: 12,420
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 55.9% percentile 3.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles12.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 24.8% 24.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 17.1% 17.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 9.1% 9.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 24.8%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Topic 16.0%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Topic 17.1%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Straw Man: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Horn Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst