Author summary
â 84% 6 analyzed articles/videos 3,092 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kenneth Shepard results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 28.5% saturation with 4,593 hits . Analysis detected 24,562 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,129 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of â 61% (2,490 of 6,316 authors). This Kenneth Shepard is worse (more manipulative) than 60.60% of the peer group. Kenneth Shepard
Author details
Total words: 16,129
Article count: 6
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.6% percentile 3.0% BS Score6 analyzed articles16.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 28.5% 28.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.9% 7.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.8% 6.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.3% 13.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 13.3% 13.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 28.5%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.9%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 13.3%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 7.5%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Indoctrination: Author 6.8%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Author 4.4%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Straw Man: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.9% Ad Hominem: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst