Kotaku73%

Over 300 New Pokémon And All Of The Other Leaks And Rumors Circulating About Winds And Waves 70%

By Kenneth Shepard84%

7/20/2026, 5:30:37 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Representativeness Heuristic, and Availability Heuristic, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 35.7% saturation with 297 hits. Analysis detected 1,493 faulty-reasoning hits from 831 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 62.7% and a BS Rank of 70% (6,533 of 21,166 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 69.10% of the article peer group.

Pokémon Winds And Waves are still a year away, but anyone who’s ever paid attention to the series’ community knows that it is full of leakers, theory crafters, and a whole lot of misinformation. 
A new wave of “leaks” is starting to circulate, some of which are propped up by the Teraleak from 2024 that revealed a flood of new information about both new and old projects in works at Game Freak and The Pokémon Company. 
Others are coming from leakers claiming to have access to early builds, and the occasional “trust me, bro” post on social media. 
If you want to know what folks are talking about, take it all with a grain of salt, but read on. 
Winds And Waves may have over 300 new Pokémon and forms 
One of the biggest rumors circulating about Winds and Waves, allegedly based on an early build of the game, is that it will add more than 300 Pokémon to the Pokédex. 
If true, it would replace the original games as the title with the largest, er, wave of new additions in one generation, more than doubling the 151 introduced by those games. 
This 300 will reportedly include new species and regional variant forms for established ones. 
One theory is that this number might include all the possible forms of a mysterious “Seed” Pokémon that will transform into one of several forms depending on in-game events, and it sounds like that monster might have a lot of variability if it accounts for a significant portion of that huge number. 
The new battle gimmick will introduce transformations similar to Megas and Gigantamax 
We’ve learned bits and pieces about Winds and Waves‘ new battle gimmick, though we’ve yet to see it in action. 
The current running rumor is that it will involve weather-based attacks and transformations not too dissimilar from Mega Evolutions in X, Y, and Legends: Z-A or the Gigantamax forms in Sword and Shield which turn Pokémon into massive kaijus. 
The only place we’ve seen anything about this new mechanic is in leaked development footage showing a Pikachu model being distorted like he’s looking at himself in a funhouse mirror, but it’s unclear if that was just an early visual placeholder for the mechanic or if that’s how it will look in the final game. 
If there are going to be full-blown transformations similar to Megas, I imagine it will be a lot more elaborate than that. 
The starters’ supposed final typings 
We saw the first forms of the new region’s starter Pokémon Browt, Pombom, and Gecqua. 
Supposedly when they evolve to their final forms, they will have the following typings: 
* Browt (Grass/Ground) 
* Pombom (Fire/Fairy) 
* Gecqua (Water/Psychic) 
That doesn’t tell us anything about what their final forms will actually look like, but you can get a sense of some of their type matchups. 
Several Pokémon are rumored to be getting some kind of new form 
Pokémon has been introducing regional variants of old monsters for a few generations now, and it wouldn’t be surprising if Winds and Waves kept the tradition going. 
A few names are circulating for possible new variants in the upcoming games, though the nature of them is still unclear. 
Shellos, Salandit, Drowzee, Psyduck, Nincada, Houndour, Zweilous, Onix, and Clamperl are all rumored to have some kind of shakeup in the new games, though some of these, such as the rumored Ice/Psychic Psyduck variant, are disputed by some leakers. 
You’ll travel around on a Rotom scooter 
Winds and Waves will include an open world, and it seems like you won’t be riding around on Pokémon to get around it like you did in Scarlet and Violet. 
Early leaks mention that the player will have a scooter with a Rotom inside that will act as their primary means of traversal. 
This will apparently be able to hover like a hoverboard and tether to Pokémon like a sled in some cases. 
When the games were finally revealed earlier this year, fans noticed that the player characters are carrying a board-like device on their person, so the leak seems plausible. 
There may be some level of voice acting in a mainline Pokémon game 
As the Pokémon games have transitioned into 3D, their jarring lack of voice acting in cinematic scenes has become harder to ignore. 
Legends: Z-A gave the player character grunts and yells when moving through the world, but they never said a full sentence out loud. 
It’s unclear if this will change in Winds and Waves, but prominent leaker BallGuy claims that some level of voice recording has taken place for the games. 
As we’ve seen in previous Pokémon leaks, early builds may not accurately reflect the final game, and even the information that came from the Teraleaks is several years out of date. 
We’ll see how much of this comes to pass when Winds and Waves launch in 2027. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 9.6%Kenneth Shepard: 6.3%Kotaku: 4.0%Confirmation Bias9.6%This article: 9.3%Kenneth Shepard: 1.4%Kotaku: 1.6%Anchoring Bias9.3%This article: 14.3%Kenneth Shepard: 4.6%Kotaku: 3.9%Availability Heuristic14.3%This article: 14.7%Kenneth Shepard: 2.0%Kotaku: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic14.7%This article: 0.0%Kenneth Shepard: 1.7%Kotaku: 1.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 6.3%Kenneth Shepard: 1.7%Kotaku: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias6.3%This article: 4.2%Kenneth Shepard: 3.8%Kotaku: 5.8%Framing Effect4.2%This article: 0.0%Kenneth Shepard: 0.6%Kotaku: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.2%Kenneth Shepard: 2.3%Kotaku: 1.1%Status Quo Bias3.2%This article: 3.7%Kenneth Shepard: 0.2%Kotaku: 0.4%Sunk Cost Effect3.7%This article: 7.9%Kenneth Shepard: 2.3%Kotaku: 2.8%Optimism Bias7.9%This article: 2.6%Kenneth Shepard: 1.7%Kotaku: 3.4%Pessimism Bias2.6%This article: 6.7%Kenneth Shepard: 13.3%Kotaku: 13.6%Negativity Bias6.7%This article: 0.0%Kenneth Shepard: 0.6%Kotaku: 2.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kenneth Shepard: 2.1%Kotaku: 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Kenneth Shepard: 0.5%Kotaku: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kenneth Shepard: 2.3%Kotaku: 1.3%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 4.7%Kenneth Shepard: 0.2%Kotaku: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias4.7%This article: 0.0%Kenneth Shepard: 7.5%Kotaku: 3.6%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kenneth Shepard: 0.9%Kotaku: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kenneth Shepard: 0.2%Kotaku: 0.2%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 7.0%Kenneth Shepard: 3.3%Kotaku: 2.4%Recency Bias7.0%This article: 1.3%Kenneth Shepard: 1.0%Kotaku: 0.6%Primacy Effect1.3%This article: 0.0%Kenneth Shepard: 0.0%Kotaku: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kenneth Shepard: 2.8%Kotaku: 1.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Kenneth Shepard: 2.9%Kotaku: 0.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 8.3%Kenneth Shepard: 2.5%Kotaku: 2.6%Appeal to Authority8.3%This article: 4.7%Kenneth Shepard: 4.4%Kotaku: 2.3%False Dilemma4.7%This article: 0.0%Kenneth Shepard: 0.9%Kotaku: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Kenneth Shepard: 0.2%Kotaku: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 16.8%Kenneth Shepard: 13.3%Kotaku: 9.1%Hasty Generalization16.8%This article: 0.0%Kenneth Shepard: 0.5%Kotaku: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Kenneth Shepard: 1.0%Kotaku: 1.0%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 2.6%Kenneth Shepard: 7.9%Kotaku: 5.9%Appeal to Emotion2.6%This article: 0.0%Kenneth Shepard: 1.2%Kotaku: 0.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 6.6%Kenneth Shepard: 2.2%Kotaku: 2.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)6.6%This article: 0.0%Kenneth Shepard: 0.6%Kotaku: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Kenneth Shepard: 0.2%Kotaku: 0.7%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Kenneth Shepard: 0.0%Kotaku: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Kenneth Shepard: 1.2%Kotaku: 0.5%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 2.6%Kenneth Shepard: 4.5%Kotaku: 4.3%Anecdotal2.6%This article: 0.0%Kenneth Shepard: 0.3%Kotaku: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 35.7%Kenneth Shepard: 3.2%Kotaku: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)35.7%This article: 0.0%Kenneth Shepard: 0.0%Kotaku: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Kenneth Shepard: 0.1%Kotaku: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Kenneth Shepard: 0.2%Kotaku: 0.5%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Kenneth Shepard: 0.0%Kotaku: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Kenneth Shepard: 0.0%Kotaku: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Kenneth Shepard: 2.7%Kotaku: 2.7%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 1.3%Kenneth Shepard: 1.2%Kotaku: 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection1.3%This article: 2.6%Kenneth Shepard: 28.5%Kotaku: 15.2%Biased Writer Voice2.6%This article: 2.5%Kenneth Shepard: 6.8%Kotaku: 2.4%Indoctrination2.5%This article: 0.0%Kenneth Shepard: 1.7%Kotaku: 0.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kenneth Shepard: 0.0%Kotaku: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kenneth Shepard: 0.7%Kotaku: 3.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

831 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker3.2%attributed speech804writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 52 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 55 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageBallGuy • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

BallGuy

100%flagged-word coverage
27 attributed words100% of attributed speech91% writer coverage
0%2.5%5.0%Biased Writer Voice-2.7 ptsWriter: 2.7%BallGuy: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-2.6 ptsWriter: 2.6%BallGuy: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-1.4 ptsWriter: 1.4%BallGuy: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.