Topic summary
⁠70%2 analyzed articles/videos831 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pokemon results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Hasty Generalization, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 553 hits. Analysis detected 4,017 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,515 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (7,947 of 16,562 topics). This Pokemon is worse (more manipulative) than 52.00% of the peer group.
Pokemon
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,515
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

52% percentile
025507510052.0% percentile
3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 12.3%12.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 6.6%6.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 5.8%5.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.2%4.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 6.6%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 0.5%Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Horn Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos