Topic summary
89%1 analyzed article/video831 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Winds And Waves results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 303 hits. Analysis detected 2,606 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,493 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 68% (5,435 of 16,562 topics). This Winds And Waves is worse (more manipulative) than 67.20% of the peer group.
Winds And Waves
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,493
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

67% percentile
025507510067.2% percentile
4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.5%4.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 11.9%11.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 12.2%12.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 8.3%8.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 11.9%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 4.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.3%Personal Incredulity: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos