Keyword summary
89%1 analyzed article/video831 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pokemon Winds And Waves results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 303 hits. Analysis detected 2,606 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,493 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 71% (10,900 of 37,536 keywords). This Pokemon Winds And Waves is worse (more manipulative) than 71.00% of the peer group.
Pokemon Winds And Waves
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
71%Pokemon Winds And Waves (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,493
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

71% percentile
025507510071.0% percentile
4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 11.9%11.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Keyword 6.5%6.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 12.2%12.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 8.3%8.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 4.0%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.3%Personal Incredulity: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos