Author summary
53% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,151 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ash Parrish results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Halo Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 26.9% saturation with 2,854 hits . Analysis detected 15,315 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,613 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 64% (2,384 of 6,536 authors). This Ash Parrish is worse (more manipulative) than 63.50% of the peer group. Ash Parrish
Author details
Total words: 10,613
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
64% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.5% percentile 3.2% BS Score4 analyzed articles10.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 26.9% 26.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.1% 8.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.2% 13.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 11.4% 11.4% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 5.7% 5.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.0%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 26.9%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 13.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.1%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 11.4%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.6%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 5.7%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.4%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst