Publication summary
67% 58 analyzed articles/videos 22,863 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Windows Central results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Optimism Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 18,267 hits . Analysis detected 156,372 faulty-reasoning hits from 138,434 analyzed words across 58 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 58% (162 of 379 publications). This Windows Central is worse (more manipulative) than 57.40% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 138,434
Article count: 58
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.4% percentile 2.1% BS Score58 analyzed articles138.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 8.2% 8.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 13.2% 13.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 4.0% 4.0% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Publication 6.7% 6.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 4.7% 4.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 4.3% 4.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Publication 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 5.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 8.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 13.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 8.8%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Publication 8.2%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Publication 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 6.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 6.7%, sitewide 0.5% Anecdotal: Publication 3.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst