Author summary
77% 9 analyzed articles/videos 1,374 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alexander Cope results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , Negativity Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.9% saturation with 3,046 hits . Analysis detected 27,639 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,990 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 74% (1,652 of 6,170 authors). This Alexander Cope is worse (more manipulative) than 73.20% of the peer group. Alexander Cope
Author details
Total words: 16,990
Article count: 9
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
73% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 73.2% percentile 3.9% BS Score9 analyzed articles17K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.2% 5.2% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 16.5% 16.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 17.9% 17.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.2% 7.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 12.4% 12.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.5% 13.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.9% 5.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.7% 4.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.5%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 17.9%, sitewide 5.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 16.5%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.2%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 12.4%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.5%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 7.0%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Author 7.6%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Author 4.6%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Author 4.7%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst