Publication summary
67% 62 analyzed articles/videos 23,672 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Windows Central results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 19,218 hits . Analysis detected 162,807 faulty-reasoning hits from 144,630 analyzed words across 62 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 57% (172 of 399 publications). This Windows Central is worse (more manipulative) than 57.00% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 144,630
Article count: 62
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.0% percentile 2.1% BS Score62 analyzed articles144.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 8.4% 8.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 13.3% 13.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 3.9% 3.9% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Publication 7.0% 7.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 4.6% 4.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 4.2% 4.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Publication 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 5.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 8.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 13.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 8.8%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Publication 8.1%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Publication 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 7.0%, sitewide 0.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 3.8%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Publication 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 1.1% Pessimism Bias: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst