Author summary
44% 11 analyzed articles/videos 2,955 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sean Endicott results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , Negativity Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 3,223 hits . Analysis detected 21,754 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,098 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 31% (4,515 of 6,500 authors). This Sean Endicott is better (less manipulative) than 69.50% of the peer group. Sean Endicott
Author details
Total words: 23,098
Article count: 11
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.5% percentile 2.0% BS Score11 analyzed articles23.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 13.9% 13.9% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 7.6% 7.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.3% 3.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 13.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 7.6%, sitewide 0.5% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst