The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt - Songs of the Past DLC expansion has been confirmed to appear at Gamescom 2026's opening night live ceremony 76%

By Alexander Cope77%

7/21/2026, 6:22:14 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 29% saturation with 158 hits. Analysis detected 1,507 faulty-reasoning hits from 544 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 67.3% and a BS Rank of 76% (5,428 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 75.20% of the article peer group.

Fans of the legendary action-RPG, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt , won't have to wonder when they can expect to see gameplay footage of its upcoming Songs of the Past expansion anymore, as CD Projekt Red has confirmed that it will show off the DLC for the first time during Gamescom 2026's Opening Night Live ceremony. 
This ceremony will take place on August 25, 2026, 11:00 am PT / 2:00 pm ET / 8:00 pm CEST . 
Our Path to #gamescom 2026 starts with #OpeningNightLive. 
On August 25, catch a glimpse of The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt - Songs of the Past during the show! 
🗓️ Mark your calendars: watch ONL on August 25 at 11am PT / 2pm ET / 8pm CEST pic.twitter.com/6nCKo9ETbk July 21, 2026 
Very little is known about this DLC expansion other than that the developers confirmed that the scale of its content will be similar to the 'Blood and Wine' expansion , and that it will be dropping support for Windows 10 and Xbox One , as the hardware spec requirements it brings are beyond last-gen hardware to handle. 
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt - Songs of the Past DLC is expected to release sometime in 2027, for Xbox Series X | S , PlayStation 5, and PC. 
Windows Central's take 
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is widely regarded as one of the best games released in the last generation of consoles, which people still play to this day, as it reached a milestone of selling over 60 million copies last year . 
We even gave it a glowing review back in 2018 for providing hundreds of hours' worth of exciting storytelling, character writing, and rewarding open-world exploration and combat...and that was just for the base game alone. 
Each DLC expansion that followed added tons more content and gripping stories on top of what was already a solid game to begin with. 
In fact, the Blood and Wine expansion was so well-done and packed with so much content that it won the award for Best RPG at the 2016 Game Awards , beating out fully priced standalone games like Dark Souls 3 and Deus Ex: Mankind Divided. 
So I can't imagine how CD Projekt Red plans to top Blood and Wine's success with the upcoming Songs of the Past expansion. 
Either way, I can't wait to replay this classic again soon when the next DLC drops and see what The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt - Songs of the Past has in store for players (and if its story will set the events for the upcoming Witcher 4 ) when it makes its debut at Gamescom 2026 on August 25, 2026. 
But what do you think? 
Are you excited to see The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt - Songs of the Past DLC? 
Do you still play The Witcher 3 even over a decade since it first released in 2015? 
If you have any thoughts, please let us know through the poll, the comments section, or our Reddit page. 
Join us on Reddit at r/WindowsCentral to share your insights and discuss our latest news, reviews, and more. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 10.3%Alexander Cope: 4.0%Windows Central: 4.2%Confirmation Bias10.3%This article: 10.5%Alexander Cope: 1.3%Windows Central: 1.0%Anchoring Bias10.5%This article: 18.2%Alexander Cope: 6.8%Windows Central: 4.6%Availability Heuristic18.2%This article: 0.0%Alexander Cope: 1.3%Windows Central: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Cope: 1.8%Windows Central: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 5.3%Alexander Cope: 3.5%Windows Central: 2.9%Overconfidence Bias5.3%This article: 1.5%Alexander Cope: 4.9%Windows Central: 5.0%Framing Effect1.5%This article: 0.0%Alexander Cope: 1.7%Windows Central: 1.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.1%Alexander Cope: 0.7%Windows Central: 0.9%Status Quo Bias3.1%This article: 6.4%Alexander Cope: 0.3%Windows Central: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect6.4%This article: 19.7%Alexander Cope: 12.2%Windows Central: 8.0%Optimism Bias19.7%This article: 4.2%Alexander Cope: 4.0%Windows Central: 3.0%Pessimism Bias4.2%This article: 0.0%Alexander Cope: 12.9%Windows Central: 8.6%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Cope: 2.9%Windows Central: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Cope: 1.6%Windows Central: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Cope: 0.6%Windows Central: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 2.9%Alexander Cope: 0.6%Windows Central: 1.2%In-Group Bias2.9%This article: 0.0%Alexander Cope: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 25.7%Alexander Cope: 6.6%Windows Central: 4.1%Halo Effect25.7%This article: 0.0%Alexander Cope: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Cope: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.4%Alexander Cope: 2.4%Windows Central: 2.2%Recency Bias4.4%This article: 0.0%Alexander Cope: 0.5%Windows Central: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Cope: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Cope: 0.4%Windows Central: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Cope: 0.2%Windows Central: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 29.0%Alexander Cope: 5.6%Windows Central: 3.7%Appeal to Authority29.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Cope: 2.1%Windows Central: 1.7%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 11.0%Alexander Cope: 1.6%Windows Central: 1.0%Slippery Slope11.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Cope: 0.2%Windows Central: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 9.7%Alexander Cope: 11.5%Windows Central: 8.5%Hasty Generalization9.7%This article: 0.0%Alexander Cope: 0.5%Windows Central: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 7.7%Alexander Cope: 2.3%Windows Central: 1.1%Bandwagon7.7%This article: 0.0%Alexander Cope: 7.1%Windows Central: 3.8%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 11.0%Alexander Cope: 1.6%Windows Central: 0.9%Begging the Question11.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Cope: 3.0%Windows Central: 2.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Cope: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Cope: 1.3%Windows Central: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Cope: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Cope: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 6.4%Alexander Cope: 5.4%Windows Central: 4.0%Anecdotal6.4%This article: 0.0%Alexander Cope: 0.2%Windows Central: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 18.8%Alexander Cope: 2.8%Windows Central: 2.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)18.8%This article: 0.0%Alexander Cope: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Cope: 0.4%Windows Central: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Cope: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Cope: 0.3%Windows Central: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Cope: 0.2%Windows Central: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 10.5%Alexander Cope: 2.7%Windows Central: 3.0%Unattributed Quote10.5%This article: 0.0%Alexander Cope: 1.9%Windows Central: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 21.0%Alexander Cope: 19.0%Windows Central: 13.9%Biased Writer Voice21.0%This article: 14.0%Alexander Cope: 4.5%Windows Central: 1.9%Indoctrination14.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Cope: 0.1%Windows Central: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Cope: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 25.6%Alexander Cope: 15.3%Windows Central: 6.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…25.6%

544 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.