Author summary
61% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,679 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cale Hunt results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Optimism Bias , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 1,393 hits . Analysis detected 10,660 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,704 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 54% (2,909 of 6,268 authors). This Cale Hunt is worse (more manipulative) than 53.60% of the peer group. Cale Hunt
Author details
Total words: 9,704
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
54% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.6% percentile 2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 14.3% 14.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 13.6% 13.6% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 5.9% 5.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.5% 6.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 14.3%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 13.6%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Author 7.6%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 4.6% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.9%, sitewide 0.5% Anecdotal: Author 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst