Author summary
20%4 analyzed articles/videos2,418 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mauro Huculak results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Indoctrination, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 1,402 hits. Analysis detected 9,489 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,402 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 19% (5,412 of 6,628 authors). This Mauro Huculak is better (less manipulative) than 81.70% of the peer group.
Mauro Huculak
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
19%Mauro Huculak (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 15,402
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

18% percentile
025507510018.3% percentile
1.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles15.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 9.1%9.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.0%3.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.1%0.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.4%2.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.9%2.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.0%3.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 9.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate