Topic summary
25% 8 analyzed articles/videos 1,792 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Detroit results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 711 hits . Analysis detected 7,998 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,600 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 33% (10,940 of 16,101 topics). This Detroit is better (less manipulative) than 67.90% of the peer group. Detroit
Topic details
Total words: 9,600
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.1% percentile 2.3% BS Score8 analyzed articles9.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.2% 6.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst