ATF: Gun thrown from speeding car leads to machine-gun, shooting cases in Metro Detroit 14%

By Erika Erickson9%

7/23/2026, 9:00:01 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 17 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 28.1% saturation with 146 hits. Analysis detected 1,058 faulty-reasoning hits from 519 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 30.7% and a BS Rank of 14% (18,818 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 86.00% of the article peer group.

Federal agents in Detroit say a freeway chase ended with the discovery of a pistol outfitted with an illegal machine-gun conversion device and has been linked to a shooting just days earlier. 
Henry Leon Hutchinson Jr. is now charged for illegally possessing a Glock 19 9mm pistol allegedly fitted with a machine-gun conversion device, often called a “switch.” 
A chase and a toss 
On May 5, 2026, a Michigan State Police trooper said they spotted a black Nissan sedan speeding eastbound on I-96. 
The trooper activated emergency lights to initiate a stop, but the feds said the Nissan exited to Grand River and slowed, “but did not stop.” 
Then, the trooper said they saw the driver -- described as “a black male with braids or dreadlocks,” throw an object “consistent with a firearm” out of the driver-side window, and onto the grassy area near the freeway shoulder. 
The car kept going, allegedly running a red light and making a left turn from the right-turn lane before police stopped the pursuit. 
When troopers searched the area where the object was thrown, they said they found a Glock 19 with a “loaded extended magazine” and a blue machine-gun conversion device (MCD) attached. 
Linking the Glock to a shooting 
A license plate reader near the Grand River exit allegedly captured a similar Nissan at the same time. 
Capturing the plate number, a check then found that Hutchinson’s mother had rented the vehicle May 4 through May 6, the feds said. 
The next day, police said they stopped the same car, and Hutchinson was driving, with another passenger inside. 
A preliminary review of cell data, according to the feds, then tied Hutchinson’s phone to the location of the attempted traffic stop on May 5, and preliminary ballistics linked shell casings fired from the recovered Glock to an April 2026 shooting in Detroit. 
ShotSpotter data and audio from a shooting on April 29 allegedly showed that “a potential machine gun may have been used,” and preliminary cell-data analysis then linked Hutchinson’s phone to the shooting area around that time, the feds said. 
Messages about ‘buttons’ and a photo 
Federal law defines a machine gun as “any weapon which shoots, is designed to shoot, or can be readily restored to shoot, automatically more than one shot, without manual reloading, by a single function of the trigger.” 
ATF investigators said they believed Hutchinson understood what these devices are, citing a couple of phone conversations. 
In one example from November 2023, an associate allegedly asked Hutchinson to send a picture of “button compared to green,” noting that “button” is slang “known to refer to an MCD.” 
Hutchinson allegedly sent an image depicting a suspected firearm equipped with a green MCD. 
Records show Hutchinson is incarcerated at the Fayette County Prison in Uniontown, PA, in connection with a different case, and is in custody of the MDOC/Fayette County Sheriff’s Office. 
Hutchinson is scheduled to appear in Detroit on Friday, Sept. 11, 2026, at 1 p.m. 
Copyright 2026 by WDIV ClickOnDetroit - All rights reserved. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 22.9%Erika Erickson: 7.6%WDIV: 3.0%Confirmation Bias22.9%This article: 3.5%Erika Erickson: 1.2%WDIV: 0.7%Anchoring Bias3.5%This article: 11.9%Erika Erickson: 4.0%WDIV: 3.0%Availability Heuristic11.9%This article: 0.0%Erika Erickson: 0.0%WDIV: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Erika Erickson: 0.0%WDIV: 0.2%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 16.6%Erika Erickson: 5.5%WDIV: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias16.6%This article: 2.7%Erika Erickson: 0.9%WDIV: 4.4%Framing Effect2.7%This article: 0.0%Erika Erickson: 0.0%WDIV: 0.7%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Erika Erickson: 0.0%WDIV: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Erika Erickson: 0.0%WDIV: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Erika Erickson: 0.0%WDIV: 2.0%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Erika Erickson: 0.0%WDIV: 0.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 23.3%Erika Erickson: 7.8%WDIV: 6.0%Negativity Bias23.3%This article: 0.0%Erika Erickson: 0.0%WDIV: 0.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 3.3%Erika Erickson: 1.1%WDIV: 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error3.3%This article: 0.0%Erika Erickson: 0.0%WDIV: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Erika Erickson: 0.0%WDIV: 0.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Erika Erickson: 0.0%WDIV: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 5.6%Erika Erickson: 1.9%WDIV: 2.2%Halo Effect5.6%This article: 0.0%Erika Erickson: 0.0%WDIV: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Erika Erickson: 0.0%WDIV: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 7.3%Erika Erickson: 2.4%WDIV: 1.1%Recency Bias7.3%This article: 0.0%Erika Erickson: 0.0%WDIV: 0.1%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Erika Erickson: 0.0%WDIV: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 5.6%Erika Erickson: 1.9%WDIV: 0.2%Ad Hominem5.6%This article: 0.0%Erika Erickson: 0.0%WDIV: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 7.1%Erika Erickson: 2.4%WDIV: 3.9%Appeal to Authority7.1%This article: 0.0%Erika Erickson: 0.0%WDIV: 0.7%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Erika Erickson: 0.0%WDIV: 0.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Erika Erickson: 0.0%WDIV: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 11.6%Erika Erickson: 3.9%WDIV: 2.2%Hasty Generalization11.6%This article: 0.0%Erika Erickson: 0.0%WDIV: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Erika Erickson: 0.0%WDIV: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Erika Erickson: 0.0%WDIV: 3.5%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Erika Erickson: 0.0%WDIV: 0.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 14.6%Erika Erickson: 4.9%WDIV: 2.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)14.6%This article: 0.0%Erika Erickson: 0.0%WDIV: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 11.0%Erika Erickson: 3.7%WDIV: 1.1%Burden of Proof11.0%This article: 0.0%Erika Erickson: 0.0%WDIV: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Erika Erickson: 0.0%WDIV: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Erika Erickson: 0.0%WDIV: 1.9%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Erika Erickson: 0.0%WDIV: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 28.1%Erika Erickson: 9.4%WDIV: 2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)28.1%This article: 0.0%Erika Erickson: 0.0%WDIV: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Erika Erickson: 0.0%WDIV: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Erika Erickson: 0.0%WDIV: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Erika Erickson: 0.0%WDIV: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Erika Erickson: 0.0%WDIV: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 20.4%Erika Erickson: 6.8%WDIV: 1.8%Unattributed Quote20.4%This article: 0.0%Erika Erickson: 0.0%WDIV: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 8.3%Erika Erickson: 2.8%WDIV: 1.7%Biased Writer Voice8.3%This article: 0.0%Erika Erickson: 0.0%WDIV: 1.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Erika Erickson: 0.0%WDIV: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Erika Erickson: 0.0%WDIV: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Erika Erickson: 0.0%WDIV: 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

519 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.