Speaker summary
⁠70%4 analyzed articles/videos75.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Storm Prediction Center results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 72.3% saturation with 73 hits. Analysis detected 105.682 faulty-reasoning hits from 75.5 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 57.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (7,339 of 28,364 speakers). This Storm Prediction Center is worse (more manipulative) than 74.10% of the peer group.
Storm Prediction Center
Speaker details
Total words: 75.5
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

74% percentile
025507510074.1% percentile
57.8% BS Score4 analyzed videos75.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 72.3%72.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 43.3%43.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 72.3%, sitewide 11.1%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 43.3%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos