Author summary
0% 6 analyzed articles/videos 5,517 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kirsten Grieshaber results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Availability Heuristic , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 3,399 hits . Analysis detected 14,392 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,878 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 12% (5,485 of 6,185 authors). This Kirsten Grieshaber is better (less manipulative) than 88.70% of the peer group. Kirsten Grieshaber
Author details
Total words: 23,878
Article count: 6
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.3% percentile 1.5% BS Score6 analyzed articles23.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.2% 14.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 14.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst