Author summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 4,514 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Isabel Debre results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Optimism Bias , and Unattributed Quote , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 2,687 hits . Analysis detected 10,756 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,056 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 14% (5,741 of 6,628 authors). This Isabel Debre is better (less manipulative) than 86.60% of the peer group. Isabel Debre
Author details
Total words: 18,056
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.4% percentile 1.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles18.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 14.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst