Speaker summary
â 43% 78 analyzed articles/videos 3,239.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Centers for Disease Control and Prevention results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Negativity Bias , and Anchoring Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 358.654 hits . Analysis detected 2,796.401 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,239.333 analyzed words across 78 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of â 1% (25,986 of 26,053 speakers). This Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is better (less manipulative) than 99.70% of the peer group. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Speaker details
Total words: 3,239.333
Article count: 78
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.3% percentile 2.2% BS Score78 analyzed videos3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 6.7% 6.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 0.7% 0.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 5.9% 5.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 4.1% 4.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 4.0% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst