4 facts to stay informed during a Legionnaires’ disease outbreak in New York City 24%

By Madison Czopek14%

7/20/2026, 9:04:06 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 26.1% saturation with 264 hits. Analysis detected 1,448 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,010 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 37.2% and a BS Rank of 24% (15,608 of 20,516 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 76.10% of the article peer group.

As a third person died from Legionnaires’ disease in New York City this month, public health officials said they believed the outbreak’s bacterial source had been eliminated. 
Testing found living or dead legionella bacteria in 76 Upper East Side cooling towers on buildings, including in museums, private schools and expensive apartment complexes. 
The city ordered owners to drain, clean and disinfect the cooling towers that tested positive for the bacteria, and officials say that remediation was complete as of July 18. 
By that point, 74 people had been diagnosed with the illness. 
And although eight people remained hospitalized with the disease a day later, the city’s health department said newly diagnosed cases were declining. 
For people outside of New York, this outbreak may seem isolated, but Legionnaires’ disease cases have been steadily rising across the country in recent years. 
Here are four things to keep in mind. 
#1: Legionnaires’ disease is a serious bacterial pneumonia most often spread through contaminated water vapor droplets. 
Most Legionnaires’ disease cases occur when someone breathes in mist or water vapor  such as the spray or steam from a shower or sink  contaminated with legionella bacteria, which then infects the lungs. 
It doesn’t spread from person to person. 
Swallowing water containing the bacteria won’t infect you, but you can be infected if you aspirate contaminated water by coughing or choking while drinking  sometimes described as water “going down the wrong pipe.” 
Although legionella bacteria exists naturally in lakes and soil, human-made water systems where bacteria can thrive pose the greatest risk of infection, Johns Hopkins Medicine reported . 
Legionnaires’ disease cases have been linked to hot tubs, hot water tanks and heaters, humidifiers, fountains, swimming pools, birthing pools, surgical intubation and drinking water systems. 
Outbreaks like the one in New York City have been tied to large air-conditioning systems in buildings such as hotels, high-rises and hospitals that use cooling towers filled with water to remove heat. 
If legionella bacteria grows in the cooling tower water, it can be circulated throughout the building’s air, according to Johns Hopkins Medicine. 
(AC systems in smaller homes and cars aren’t a potential outbreak source because they don’t rely on water.) 
The exterior of Frank Lloyd Wright’s Solomon R. 
Guggenheim Museum in New York, May 31, 2011. 
The museum was among the Manhattan buildings with cooling towers that recently tested positive for legionella bacteria amid the July 2026 Legionnaires’ disease outbreak. 
(AP) 
#2: Smokers, older adults and immunocompromised people are most at risk. 
Anyone can get Legionnaires’ disease, but exposure to legionella bacteria doesn’t guarantee someone will. 
People are most at risk of developing the illness and experiencing complications if they are over age 50, have a weakened immune system, have smoked or have chronic respiratory disease or another serious condition such as emphysema, diabetes or cancer. 
Black people and people with lower incomes also have higher rates of Legionnaires’ disease, according to an archived Centers for Disease Control and Prevention page. 
A 2022 CDC study of Legionnaires’ disease’s epidemiological patterns found that the average incidence of the illness was twice as high among Black people than among white people. 
Legionnaires’ disease can cause life-threatening complications such as respiratory failure, heart inflammation or kidney failure. 
Doctors often prescribe antibiotics to kill legionella bacteria and that typically cures Legionnaires’ disease. 
Most people with Legionnaires’ disease need hospital care but will fully recover, especially with early treatment, according to the American Lung Association. 
#3: Annual cases of Legionnaires’ disease have been largely rising since the early 2000s. 
CDC data shows that since 2000, annual incidence of Legionnaires’ disease in the U.S. has increased. 
Cases peaked in 2018 and then dropped in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic before resurging, but they have not returned to the lower levels recorded in the early and mid-2000s. 
Scientists have not identified the exact cause of this steady increase, but factors including climate change could be contributing. 
Researchers expect waterborne illnesses to rise as climate change drives changes in conditions such as temperature, heavy rainfall, flooding and drought. 
A 2026 Diagnostic Microbiology & Infectious Disease study found that rising temperatures driven by climate change are increasing the risk of Legionnaires’ disease. 
A 2023 study published in the Epidemiology & Infection journal found that more precipitation was associated with elevated risk of Legionnaires’ disease, as were higher temperatures and relative humidity, though those factors’ influences were more moderate. 
Declining air pollution could also play a role. 
A 2024 PNAS Nexus study found that the uptick in cases of Legionnaires’ disease correlates with a decrease in acidic sulfur dioxide air pollution in the U.S. 
Higher acidity in water droplets is less hospitable for legionella bacteria, so the researchers argued that declining sulfur dioxide pollution could be linked to rising cases of Legionnaires’ disease. 
#4: Legionnaires disease once sparked wild conspiracy theories. 
The illness was first documented during a large July 1976 outbreak that drew national attention. 
Everyone who was sick had attended the American Legion Convention in Philadelphia and stayed at the same hotel. 
Within a week of the conference’s end, over 200 people had become sick and 34 had died . 
Fearing a greater outbreak, the CDC sent a large team of epidemiologists to investigate , but the scientists couldn’t quickly pinpoint its cause. 
The unknowns drove speculation and sparked conspiracy theories . 
Given that the country was celebrating its bicentennial and many victims were veterans, some theorized that a foreign power was responsible for the illness while others, including Philadelphia’s mayor, blamed activists opposing the Vietnam War, The Telegraph reported . 
It took scientists months  until January 1977  to identify the bacteria responsible for the mysterious and fatal illness. 
The bacteria’s name, legionella, and the name of the disease it causes trace back to this famous outbreak among American Legion members. 
PolitiFact Staff Researcher Caryn Baird contributed to this report. 
RELATED: What is cyclosporiasis and how can you avoid catching this, uh, ‘explosive’ GI illness? 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 2.9%Madison Czopek: 1.1%@politifact: 2.0%Confirmation Bias2.9%This article: 0.0%Madison Czopek: 0.9%@politifact: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 5.0%Madison Czopek: 2.5%@politifact: 2.6%Availability Heuristic5.0%This article: 4.0%Madison Czopek: 0.9%@politifact: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic4.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Czopek: 0.1%@politifact: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 8.1%Madison Czopek: 1.0%@politifact: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias8.1%This article: 2.2%Madison Czopek: 2.7%@politifact: 3.6%Framing Effect2.2%This article: 0.0%Madison Czopek: 0.1%@politifact: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Czopek: 0.3%@politifact: 0.2%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Czopek: 0.0%@politifact: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 9.2%Madison Czopek: 1.4%@politifact: 0.8%Optimism Bias9.2%This article: 4.3%Madison Czopek: 1.9%@politifact: 1.0%Pessimism Bias4.3%This article: 5.7%Madison Czopek: 6.4%@politifact: 5.1%Negativity Bias5.7%This article: 0.0%Madison Czopek: 0.0%@politifact: 0.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Czopek: 0.3%@politifact: 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Czopek: 0.0%@politifact: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 3.9%Madison Czopek: 0.2%@politifact: 0.6%In-Group Bias3.9%This article: 0.0%Madison Czopek: 0.0%@politifact: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Czopek: 1.0%@politifact: 0.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Czopek: 0.0%@politifact: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Czopek: 0.0%@politifact: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 9.6%Madison Czopek: 2.4%@politifact: 1.0%Recency Bias9.6%This article: 1.6%Madison Czopek: 0.4%@politifact: 0.2%Primacy Effect1.6%This article: 0.0%Madison Czopek: 0.1%@politifact: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Czopek: 0.0%@politifact: 0.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Czopek: 0.2%@politifact: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 26.1%Madison Czopek: 7.0%@politifact: 4.6%Appeal to Authority26.1%This article: 4.3%Madison Czopek: 1.0%@politifact: 0.8%False Dilemma4.3%This article: 0.0%Madison Czopek: 0.3%@politifact: 0.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Czopek: 0.0%@politifact: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 4.4%Madison Czopek: 3.3%@politifact: 3.0%Hasty Generalization4.4%This article: 0.0%Madison Czopek: 0.1%@politifact: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.9%Madison Czopek: 0.1%@politifact: 0.6%Bandwagon0.9%This article: 6.1%Madison Czopek: 1.4%@politifact: 2.5%Appeal to Emotion6.1%This article: 0.0%Madison Czopek: 0.0%@politifact: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 10.8%Madison Czopek: 1.4%@politifact: 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)10.8%This article: 0.0%Madison Czopek: 0.0%@politifact: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Czopek: 0.5%@politifact: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Czopek: 0.8%@politifact: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Czopek: 0.1%@politifact: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Czopek: 1.3%@politifact: 1.0%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Czopek: 0.0%@politifact: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 9.8%Madison Czopek: 3.1%@politifact: 2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)9.8%This article: 0.0%Madison Czopek: 0.0%@politifact: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.9%Madison Czopek: 0.1%@politifact: 0.2%Middle Ground1.9%This article: 0.0%Madison Czopek: 0.0%@politifact: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Czopek: 0.0%@politifact: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Czopek: 0.1%@politifact: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 22.7%Madison Czopek: 1.2%@politifact: 1.7%Unattributed Quote22.7%This article: 0.0%Madison Czopek: 0.5%@politifact: 1.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Czopek: 1.3%@politifact: 1.6%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Czopek: 1.0%@politifact: 1.0%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Czopek: 0.2%@politifact: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Czopek: 0.1%@politifact: 0.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Czopek: 0.4%@politifact: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

1010 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers21%attributed speech799writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageJohns Hopkins Medicine • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageJohns Hopkins Medicine • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageCenters for Disease Control and Prevention • 25 words • 100.0% coverageCenters for Disease Control and Prevention • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageAmerican Lung Association • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageCenters for Disease Control and Prevention • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageCenters for Disease Control and Prevention • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageThe Telegraph • 39 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageCaryn Baird • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

The Telegraph

100%flagged-word coverage
39 attributed words18% of attributed speech73% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+90.2 ptsWriter: 9.8%The Telegraph: 100.0%100.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.