Topic summary
17% 8 analyzed articles/videos 4,827 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Climate Change Impact results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 1,919 hits . Analysis detected 18,793 faulty-reasoning hits from 32,699 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 3% (15,314 of 15,753 topics). This Climate Change Impact is better (less manipulative) than 97.20% of the peer group. Climate Change Impact
Topic details
Total words: 32,699
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.8% percentile 1.2% BS Score8 analyzed articles32.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.9% 5.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst