Author summary
67% 1 analyzed article/video 990 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Madeline Shaw results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Quote-first Misdirection as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 287 hits . Analysis detected 2,252 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,970 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 53% (3,057 of 6,448 authors). This Madeline Shaw is worse (more manipulative) than 52.60% of the peer group. Madeline Shaw
Author details
Total words: 2,970
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.6% percentile 2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.1% 6.1% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 9.7% 9.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.7% 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.8% 7.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.8%, sitewide 11.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 9.7%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst