Author summary
47% 6 analyzed articles/videos 4,792 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Inside Climate News results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 1,919 hits . Analysis detected 16,104 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,298 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 14% (5,352 of 6,192 authors). This Inside Climate News is better (less manipulative) than 86.40% of the peer group. Inside Climate News
Author details
Total words: 21,298
Article count: 6
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.6% percentile 1.5% BS Score6 analyzed articles21.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.0% 9.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.0% 7.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst