Author summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video 775 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Katie Surma results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Quote-first Misdirection , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 507 hits . Analysis detected 2,912 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,100 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of â 75% (1,716 of 6,628 authors). This Katie Surma is worse (more manipulative) than 74.10% of the peer group. Katie Surma
Author details
Total words: 3,100
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
74% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 74.1% percentile 3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 12.4% 12.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.8% 9.8% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 7.5% 7.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 16.4% 16.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.3% 4.3% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 12.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 16.4%, sitewide 11.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 7.5%, sitewide 0.0% Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% Primacy Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.9% Burden of Proof: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.4% Composition/Division: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst