Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,041 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Martha Pskowski results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 730 hits . Analysis detected 4,914 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,164 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 16% (5,361 of 6,316 authors). This Martha Pskowski is better (less manipulative) than 84.90% of the peer group. Martha Pskowski
Author details
Total words: 8,164
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.1% percentile 1.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.4% 8.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 8.9% 8.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 8.9%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.4%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst