Author summary
0% 24 analyzed articles/videos 17,364 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Condos results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and Pessimism Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 5,589 hits . Analysis detected 62,187 faulty-reasoning hits from 74,147 analyzed words across 23 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 15% (5,252 of 6,169 authors). This David Condos is better (less manipulative) than 85.10% of the peer group. David Condos
Author details
Total words: 74,147
Article count: 23
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.9% percentile 1.6% BS Score23 analyzed articles74.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.5% 7.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.3% 5.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.6% 5.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.1% 3.1% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 5.8% 5.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.5% Slippery Slope: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst