KUER0%

Earth has millions of bug species. Only Utah has this ‘beautiful little monster’ 21%

By David Condos0%

6/30/2026, 8:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 18.2% saturation with 230 hits. Analysis detected 2,326 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,262 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 35.1% and a BS Rank of 21% (17,349 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 79.30% of the article peer group.

Coral Pink Sand Dunes State Park feels like an alien landscape  a salmon-colored Sahara tucked under jagged cliffs near the Utah-Arizona border. 
The sea of sand that stretches out in front of Amanda Barth may look desolate. 
But for one unique native insect, it’s home. 
“This is the only place in the world for the Coral Pink Sand Dunes tiger beetle,” said Barth, who coordinates Utah’s Rare Insect Conservation Program. 
The beetle is about the size of a sunflower seed with an ivory back, bulging bug eyes and shimmering green and bronze accents. 
It’s a hunter armed with impressive jaws worthy of its ferocious name. 
“It's a beautiful little monster with some metallic colors on it,” Barth said. 
“They run really fast. 
They see really well. 
They can fly.” 
It only lives within the state park, which covers just a handful of sandy miles. 
So as climate change and recreation threaten its fragile desert habitat, it has nowhere else to go. 
And the Utah program studying the bugs lost the federal money that kept it afloat. 
The Trump administration has targeted billions of dollars for research nationwide and continues to seek ways to control federal funding for science. 
A crew from Utah’s Rare Insect Conservation Program treks across one of the dunes at Coral Pink Sand Dunes State Park in southern Utah, May 3, 2026. 
The annual survey continues a decades-long tradition of monitoring the tiger beetle’s population. 
The annual survey of Coral Pink Sand Dunes tiger beetles dates back to the 1990s, when Randolph-Macon College in Virginia led teams across the southern Utah dunes. 
The work Barth and her team continue to do builds on decades of research. 
The goal is to track how the beetle population fares year to year, so Utah can understand how to help the rare insects survive. 
Iris McCulloch, one of two part-time field technicians on Barth’s team, said the hardy species plays an important role in the delicate balance of this desert ecosystem. 
“It's unique to this one county, this one park,” McCulloch said. 
“If it goes, it's gone forever. 
And it's really sad to think about.” 
The dunes may seem inhospitable, but if you look closely, they teem with life. 
Beetle larvae burrow beneath the sand in swales  bowl-shaped depressions between the dunes where sparse vegetation grows. 
The adults are predators and scavengers that eat flies and other insects. 
On this sunny morning in May, Barth led around a dozen scientists and volunteers up over a dune ridge and into a swale. 
The group formed a line and slowly combed across the fine, soft sand  eyes fixed on the ground for any flicker of movement. 
“Once you know what you're looking for, it's easier to spot them,” said volunteer Louise Haven of Park City. 
Survey volunteer Louise Haven holds a mating pair of beetles that she captured in a vial, May 3, 2026. 
This was Haven’s first beetle survey. 
She has canvassed for plants before, but said it’s different when your subject is trying to get away from you. 
The beetles’ keen senses help them evade predators  or in this case, the humans with nets who want to study them. 
“It's really rewarding once you finally get one,” she said as she gently corralled a beetle and tapped it into one of the old film canisters the survey uses as vials. 
On the next dune over, volunteer Allison Blood spotted a pair of mating beetles and scooped them into her net before they knew what happened. 
Like most of the folks here, she drove several hours from northern Utah to be part of the survey, drawn by an affinity for six-legged creatures. 
“I've always loved bugs, and so I've been searching for opportunities,” Blood said. 
“I think ‘Utah entomology volunteer’ was the Google search.” 
The dunes continue to move up to 12 feet a year, McCulloch said. 
That makes it hard to maintain the protected conservation area and the posts marking its boundary. 
May 3, 2026. 
The tiger beetles can use all the extra help they can get. 
Climate change is increasing heat and droughts in southern Utah, which threatens their habitat. 
Even though the beetles are adapted to the desert, below-average precipitation means there are fewer small bugs for them to eat. 
That’s a concern in a historically dry year like this. 
The beetle larvae can delay their metamorphosis for an extra year if conditions aren’t right, Barth said, so the population may not feel the impacts of this dry winter until next year. 
“That's their one little trick,” Barth said. 
“If times are hard for more than a couple years, then they might not be able to make it.” 
And there are much larger things crawling the dunes: off-highway vehicles. 
A federal conservation agreement between Utah and the Bureau of Land Management is supposed to block off-road vehicles from the part of the park with the highest concentration of beetles. 
Even with the 265-acre conservation parcel, around 90% of the dune field is open to OHVs. 
The federal government proposed listing the beetle as threatened under the Endangered Species Act in 2013, but withdrew the proposal later that year. 
If it were listed, these dunes would become critical habitat  a change that Barth said could devastate the local recreation economy. 
But managing vehicles and beetles side by side has proven to be tricky. 
The fierce winds that created the dunes keep moving the piles of sand and the beetles that live there. 
The shifting sands also swallow the fence posts that mark the conservation area, making it harder for visitors to know the rules. 
Members of the survey crew walk past a sign marking the edge of the beetle’s conservation area, May 3, 2026. 
Scientists say even one set of tire tracks can linger as a destructive scar on the dunes. 
OHVs can directly crush the beetles and harm the sand’s ability to hold moisture, Barth said. 
Even one set of tire tracks can linger as a destructive scar. 
“That habitat is lost,” Barth said. 
“It's lost, and it takes a long time for it to recover.” 
The scientists studying the bugs face plenty of challenges, too. 
After Barth’s team lost the federal money that supported this research, she lost her only full-time employee. 
“I am grieving,” Barth said. 
“My program capacity just cratered. 
Absolutely cratered.” 
Barth has recently been able to piece together some state money to hire a part-time employee for next year’s survey season, but the reality, she said, is that Utah’s desert ecosystems remain dreadfully under-studied. 
“This is a story we know about,” Barth said of the Coral Pink Sand Dunes. 
“But there are a number of other dunes and badlands around the state that have never had anything like this amount of intensive sampling, and we really don't know what the impacts of OHV recreation are on those places.” 
Across the weeklong survey, the group found more beetles this year than last. 
That’s a promising sign, McCulloch said.<b> </b>And with so many big problems in the world, it felt good to do one small, tangible thing to help. 
“A lot of our planet that we live on is sort of slipping away from us every day, and people are too busy to notice or to care,” McCulloch said. 
“But this is the one planet that we have. 
It's the one Coral Pink Sand Dunes that we have. 
And this beetle is a really unique piece of the whole puzzle.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.3%David Condos: 3.1%KUER: 2.8%Confirmation Bias6.3%This article: 0.0%David Condos: 1.8%KUER: 1.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 5.0%David Condos: 3.0%KUER: 3.4%Availability Heuristic5.0%This article: 4.2%David Condos: 0.7%KUER: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic4.2%This article: 0.5%David Condos: 0.6%KUER: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.5%This article: 6.9%David Condos: 2.5%KUER: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias6.9%This article: 8.4%David Condos: 7.5%KUER: 7.4%Framing Effect8.4%This article: 7.6%David Condos: 2.2%KUER: 1.3%Loss Aversion7.6%This article: 4.4%David Condos: 1.0%KUER: 1.2%Status Quo Bias4.4%This article: 3.8%David Condos: 0.4%KUER: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect3.8%This article: 9.0%David Condos: 5.8%KUER: 4.4%Optimism Bias9.0%This article: 6.5%David Condos: 5.7%KUER: 2.4%Pessimism Bias6.5%This article: 17.2%David Condos: 6.8%KUER: 6.3%Negativity Bias17.2%This article: 1.0%David Condos: 1.4%KUER: 2.2%Self-Serving Bias1.0%This article: 0.0%David Condos: 0.8%KUER: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 3.6%David Condos: 0.4%KUER: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias3.6%This article: 2.1%David Condos: 1.2%KUER: 1.9%In-Group Bias2.1%This article: 0.0%David Condos: 0.4%KUER: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 8.7%David Condos: 1.0%KUER: 2.3%Halo Effect8.7%This article: 0.0%David Condos: 0.1%KUER: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%David Condos: 0.0%KUER: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.8%David Condos: 1.8%KUER: 1.2%Recency Bias3.8%This article: 2.2%David Condos: 0.2%KUER: 0.3%Primacy Effect2.2%This article: 0.0%David Condos: 0.2%KUER: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%David Condos: 0.4%KUER: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%David Condos: 0.3%KUER: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 11.3%David Condos: 5.6%KUER: 4.7%Appeal to Authority11.3%This article: 2.1%David Condos: 1.5%KUER: 1.7%False Dilemma2.1%This article: 3.7%David Condos: 2.3%KUER: 1.1%Slippery Slope3.7%This article: 0.0%David Condos: 0.1%KUER: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.1%David Condos: 2.6%KUER: 4.1%Hasty Generalization6.1%This article: 0.0%David Condos: 0.1%KUER: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.8%David Condos: 0.5%KUER: 0.7%Bandwagon0.8%This article: 18.2%David Condos: 5.3%KUER: 5.6%Appeal to Emotion18.2%This article: 0.0%David Condos: 0.6%KUER: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 9.8%David Condos: 2.9%KUER: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)9.8%This article: 0.0%David Condos: 0.0%KUER: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 5.5%David Condos: 0.4%KUER: 0.4%Burden of Proof5.5%This article: 0.0%David Condos: 0.5%KUER: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 1.0%David Condos: 0.3%KUER: 0.3%Composition/Division1.0%This article: 7.7%David Condos: 2.1%KUER: 3.1%Anecdotal7.7%This article: 0.0%David Condos: 0.0%KUER: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 10.2%David Condos: 1.0%KUER: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)10.2%This article: 0.0%David Condos: 0.0%KUER: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%David Condos: 0.1%KUER: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%David Condos: 0.1%KUER: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%David Condos: 0.0%KUER: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%David Condos: 0.2%KUER: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.4%David Condos: 0.4%KUER: 0.8%Unattributed Quote3.4%This article: 0.0%David Condos: 0.4%KUER: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.6%David Condos: 1.8%KUER: 2.2%Biased Writer Voice0.6%This article: 1.0%David Condos: 2.5%KUER: 1.6%Indoctrination1.0%This article: 0.0%David Condos: 2.1%KUER: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 1.7%David Condos: 0.4%KUER: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias1.7%This article: 0.0%David Condos: 0.5%KUER: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

1262 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers48%attributed speech657writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageAmanda Barth • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageAmanda Barth • 13 words • 100.0% coverageAmanda Barth • 4 words • 100.0% coverageAmanda Barth • 4 words • 0.0% coverageAmanda Barth • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageUtah’s Rare Insect Conservation Program • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageIris McCulloch • 27 words • 0.0% coverageIris McCulloch • 11 words • 0.0% coverageIris McCulloch • 6 words • 0.0% coverageIris McCulloch • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageAmanda Barth • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageLouise Haven • 19 words • 0.0% coverageLouise Haven • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageLouise Haven • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageLouise Haven • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageAllison Blood • 13 words • 0.0% coverageAllison Blood • 9 words • 0.0% coverageIris McCulloch • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageAmanda Barth • 32 words • 0.0% coverageAmanda Barth • 7 words • 0.0% coverageAmanda Barth • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageBureau of Land Management • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageAmanda Barth • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageAmanda Barth • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageAmanda Barth • 6 words • 0.0% coverageAmanda Barth • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageAmanda Barth • 5 words • 0.0% coverageAmanda Barth • 5 words • 0.0% coverageAmanda Barth • 2 words • 0.0% coverageAmanda Barth • 34 words • 0.0% coverageAmanda Barth • 15 words • 0.0% coverageAmanda Barth • 39 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageIris McCulloch • 26 words • 0.0% coverageIris McCulloch • 30 words • 0.0% coverageIris McCulloch • 9 words • 0.0% coverageIris McCulloch • 10 words • 0.0% coverageIris McCulloch • 12 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Iris McCulloch

100%flagged-word coverage
151 attributed words25% of attributed speech88% writer coverage
0%2.5%5.0%Politically Right Leaning -3.3 ptsWriter: 3.3%Iris McCulloch: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-1.1 ptsWriter: 1.1%Iris McCulloch: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.