Keyword summary
52% 13 analyzed articles/videos 8,928 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Public Lands results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 4,271 hits . Analysis detected 36,211 faulty-reasoning hits from 41,810 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 16% (30,237 of 35,635 keywords). This Public Lands is better (less manipulative) than 84.90% of the peer group. Public Lands
Keyword details
Total words: 41,810
Article count: 13
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.1% percentile 1.7% BS Score13 analyzed articles41.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.2% 10.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst