Author summary
0% 8 analyzed articles/videos 1,708 analyzed words
BS Summary: These KUER News results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19.4% saturation with 1,639 hits . Analysis detected 10,068 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,457 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 56% (2,759 of 6,215 authors). This KUER News is worse (more manipulative) than 55.60% of the peer group. KUER News
Author details
Total words: 8,457
Article count: 8
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 55.6% percentile 2.8% BS Score8 analyzed articles8.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.0% 7.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 19.4% 19.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.4% 3.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 19.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 18.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.1%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.2%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 2.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst