Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,029 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Threatened Species results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Confirmation Bias , and Overconfidence Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 689 hits . Analysis detected 7,783 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,349 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 35% (24,473 of 37,536 keywords). This Threatened Species is better (less manipulative) than 65.20% of the peer group. Threatened Species
Keyword details
Total words: 7,349
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.8% percentile 2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.4% 9.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 2.0% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst