Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Karen McVeigh results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 6% saturation with 183 hits. Analysis detected 2,193 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,040 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 6,363 authors). This Karen McVeigh is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Karen McVeigh
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Karen McVeigh (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 3,040
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.9%3.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.9%4.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.1%5.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.6%4.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.3%4.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.2%2.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.0%1.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 6.0%6.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.5%Slippery Slope: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos