Topic summary
11% 6 analyzed articles/videos 3,365 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Legionnaires Disease results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.3% saturation with 719 hits . Analysis detected 6,059 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,356 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 10% (14,392 of 15,923 topics). This Legionnaires Disease is better (less manipulative) than 90.40% of the peer group. Legionnaires Disease
Topic details
Total words: 11,356
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.6% percentile 1.6% BS Score6 analyzed articles11.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.1% 4.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst