Gothamist77%

NYC Legionella inspections rose only gradually before latest Legionnaires' cluster in Manhattan 10%

By Joe Hong0%

7/6/2026, 3:00:59 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Appeal to Authority, and Recency Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 191 hits. Analysis detected 1,248 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,261 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 26.8% and a BS Rank of 10% (19,769 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 90.30% of the article peer group.

City inspections of cooling towers  meant to prevent the spread of deadly Legionella bacteria  rose only gradually since last year’s near record lows, according to a Gothamist analysis of public data and numbers provided by New York City's Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. 
In over 20% of buildings, owners had not submitted required test results in the first five months of 2026. 
The sluggish rate of compliance came ahead of a new cluster of Legionnaires’ disease the health department identified on the Upper East Side late last week. 
It also follows a deadly outbreak in Central Harlem last summer that killed seven people, hospitalized 90 and sent the Adams administration scrambling to get it under control. 
Health officials are now investigating a cluster of at least 14 cases of Legionnaires’ disease cases in the Carnegie Hill and Yorkville neighborhoods in Manhattan, all located in the 10028, 10075 and 10128 ZIP codes. 
The health department said it is inspecting all cooling towers in the affected blocks, and the agency released a video of health commissioner Alister Martin going door to door on the Upper East Side informing residents that the disease is likely spreading in the area. 
The latest cluster was identified as the city was in the grips of an unprecedented heat wave, with heat index values reaching 110 to 115 degrees  weather that allows Legionella bacteria to thrive. 
The rush to contain it is reminiscent of last July, when health officials under then Mayor Eric Adams first identified the outbreak in Central Harlem. 
In the months leading up to that public health emergency, the city had inspected 59% fewer cooling towers than it had when Adams first came into office in 2022. 
Health officials at the time attributed the decline to short staffing and budget cuts. 
Gothamist’s analysis by the numbers: 
3,164 cooling towers (53%) had not received an annual inspection by the city as of April 17. 
1,308 (22%) buildings had no required test results on record in 2026 as of May 21. 
637 cooling towers (11%) have neither been inspected by the city in the past year nor have building owners submitted Legionella test results in 2026. 
Now, as of late June of this year city employees have only inspected 1,306 of the nearly 6,000 cooling towers in the city since the start of 2026. 
It’s only a slight increase from 2025, when the city inspected 1,156 cooling towers over the same period before the outbreak began last July. 
Those numbers pale in comparison to the more than 3,000 inspections in the first six months of 2017, when the city first implemented cooling tower regulations. 
Chantal Gomez, a spokesperson for the health department, said the agency “forecasts” that it completed 114 more inspections in June that had yet to be included in the data provided to Gothamist, which would bring the total to 1,420 for this year, 23% more than last year. 
In the ZIP codes included in the latest cluster, 48% of the 179 cooling towers went over a year without an inspection by the city, five points lower than the rate across the five boroughs. 
About 26% of the towers in the outbreak area have no record that building owners tested for Legionella bacteria in 2026. 
That’s roughly four points higher than the citywide rate. 
Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s office did not respond to questions about the small increase in the number of inspections since his predecessor left office and what it was doing to prevent additional outbreaks. 
Local law authorizes the health department to conduct unannounced inspections of cooling towers. 
Gomez said the agency aims to inspect every cooling tower once a year. 
But by that measure, the city is also falling far behind. 
As of April 17 of this year, more than half of the city’s cooling towers had not been inspected in over a year, according to Gothamist’s analysis of the most recently available data. 
After Gothamist reported on the staffing shortfall, the city’s health department sought to increase its ranks of “water ecologists” who inspect cooling towers, which operate as part of a building’s air conditioning system and can spread the bacteria that causes Legionnaire’s disease over an area of several city blocks. 
Gomez, the health department spokesperson, said the agency now has double the number of inspectors compared to last year. 
She said the new hires were in training for “several months” and did not conduct any inspections in May or June. 
Gomez said having additional staff will allow the department to increase inspections and that she expects the number of routine cooling tower inspections to increase as new staff continue to be onboarded. 
New testing requirements 
The health department implemented new requirements in May for building owners to test their cooling towers for legionella bacteria every 31 days, up from the previous requirement of every three months. 
The new requirements were created by city lawmakers in response to last summer’s outbreak. 
Gomez said implementing that change reduced the agency’s ability to conduct more cooling tower inspections, but did not provide further explanation. 
It’s unclear how well building owners are complying with the enhanced testing requirements. 
According to a Gothamist analysis of city data, out of the 5,944 active and registered cooling towers in the city, one in five had not submitted a test for legionella bacteria this year as of May 21, the most recent date that data was publicly available. 
The 31-day testing mandate went into effect on May 8, and is required for cooling towers that have been turned on during warmer months when Legionella bacteria is most likely to spread. 
Gomez said missing tests could mean that the tower is currently not running or started running more recently. 
April McIver, executive director at The Plumbing Foundation City of New York, an advocacy group for building water systems professionals, said city inspections are critical for keeping building owners accountable. 
“We’re always going to be supportive of more inspections that can prevent death,” she said, adding that regulations rely on both health department enforcement as well as diligence from building owners. 
Cooling towers circulate cold water throughout larger buildings to absorb heat. 
The warmed water is then pumped into a cooling tower on top of a building where it is blown out by fans as vapor. 
Without proper treatment and monitoring, warm, stagnant water can foster the growth of legionella bacteria, which can cause a type of pneumonia if the water vapor is inhaled by passersby. 
City regulations acknowledge the important roles of both the Department of Health and building owners in preventing the spread of Legionnaires’ disease. 
Fines for building owners failing to conduct testing for Legionella can range between $2,000 and $4,000. 
City health inspectors found that last year’s outbreak was caused by two cooling towers on two city owned properties. 
The first was located at Harlem Hospital. 
The second was at a nearby construction site managed by the construction company Skanska for a city public health lab. 
A Gothamist investigation found that the hospital had failed to abide by its own maintenance plan and conduct regular testing for Legionella. 
An investigation completed by the health department found that the cooling tower at the construction site had not been registered or tested. 
Health officials urge anyone who lives in the area or has visited since late June to contact a health care provider if they develop flu-like symptoms. 
New Yorkers who need help finding a provider can call 311 or (844) 692-4692. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 2.8%Joe Hong: 1.3%Gothamist: 2.7%Confirmation Bias2.8%This article: 2.3%Joe Hong: 0.6%Gothamist: 1.5%Anchoring Bias2.3%This article: 2.7%Joe Hong: 2.8%Gothamist: 3.6%Availability Heuristic2.7%This article: 2.5%Joe Hong: 0.3%Gothamist: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic2.5%This article: 1.9%Joe Hong: 2.9%Gothamist: 0.7%Hindsight Bias1.9%This article: 1.5%Joe Hong: 0.6%Gothamist: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias1.5%This article: 1.5%Joe Hong: 3.5%Gothamist: 8.4%Framing Effect1.5%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 0.4%Gothamist: 1.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 0.5%Gothamist: 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 7.8%Joe Hong: 2.6%Gothamist: 3.6%Optimism Bias7.8%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 1.4%Gothamist: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 15.1%Joe Hong: 5.4%Gothamist: 8.5%Negativity Bias15.1%This article: 2.4%Joe Hong: 3.1%Gothamist: 2.6%Self-Serving Bias2.4%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 1.1%Gothamist: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 0.0%Gothamist: 2.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 0.2%Gothamist: 2.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 10.4%Joe Hong: 1.0%Gothamist: 1.3%Recency Bias10.4%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 0.6%Gothamist: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 0.3%Gothamist: 1.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 10.7%Joe Hong: 2.8%Gothamist: 4.4%Appeal to Authority10.7%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 0.8%Gothamist: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 0.7%Gothamist: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 1.7%Joe Hong: 1.5%Gothamist: 3.8%Hasty Generalization1.7%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 10.2%Joe Hong: 4.0%Gothamist: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion10.2%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 12.0%Joe Hong: 2.4%Gothamist: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)12.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 2.5%Joe Hong: 0.8%Gothamist: 0.4%Burden of Proof2.5%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 1.6%Gothamist: 2.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 3.1%Joe Hong: 0.4%Gothamist: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.1%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 1.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.7%Joe Hong: 0.4%Gothamist: 1.2%Unattributed Quote3.7%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 0.8%Gothamist: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 1.0%Joe Hong: 1.5%Gothamist: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice1.0%This article: 2.1%Joe Hong: 1.1%Gothamist: 1.5%Indoctrination2.1%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 0.0%Gothamist: 1.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 1.1%Joe Hong: 0.2%Gothamist: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.1%

1261 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers22%attributed speech984writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 46 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageNew York City's Department of Health and Mental Hygiene • 45 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageChantal Gomez • 47 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageChantal Gomez • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 49 words • 0.0% coverageChantal Gomez • 19 words • 0.0% coverageChantal Gomez • 21 words • 0.0% coverageChantal Gomez • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageChantal Gomez • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 46 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageChantal Gomez • 18 words • 0.0% coverageApril McIver • 30 words • 0.0% coverageApril McIver • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

April McIver

100%flagged-word coverage
61 attributed words22% of attributed speech59% writer coverage
0%2.5%5.0%Indoctrination-2.6 ptsWriter: 2.6%April McIver: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -1.4 ptsWriter: 1.4%April McIver: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-1.2 ptsWriter: 1.2%April McIver: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.