Topic summary
31%7 analyzed articles/videos3,851 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Building Safety results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Self-Serving Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 2,658 hits. Analysis detected 16,541 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,278 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (12,300 of 15,507 topics). This Building Safety is better (less manipulative) than 79.30% of the peer group.
Building Safety

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

21% percentile
025507510020.7% percentile
1.9% BS Score7 analyzed articles20.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.1%0.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.1%13.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.8%2.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.0%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate