Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video776 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anthony Izaguirre results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Optimism Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 242 hits. Analysis detected 2,217 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,104 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 46% (3,429 of 6,354 authors). This Anthony Izaguirre is better (less manipulative) than 54.00% of the peer group.
Anthony Izaguirre
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
46%Anthony Izaguirre (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,104
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

46% percentile
025507510046.0% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.8%7.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.3%4.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.0%1.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.4%3.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 7.6%7.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 6.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos