Author summary
⁠0%5 analyzed articles/videos6,533 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joe Hong results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Self-Serving Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.4% saturation with 1,274 hits. Analysis detected 11,650 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,410 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠6% (6,082 of 6,448 authors). This Joe Hong is better (less manipulative) than 94.30% of the peer group.
Joe Hong
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠6%Joe Hong (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 23,410
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

6% percentile
02550751005.7% percentile
1.3% BS Score5 analyzed articles23.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.4%5.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.0%4.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.8%2.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.8%2.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.3%1.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Hindsight Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos