Gothamist77%

Opioid maker Purdue Pharma shuts down as part of legal settlement with NY and other states 97%

By Joe Hong0%

5/1/2026, 7:53:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Fundamental Attribution Error, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 22.2% saturation with 82 hits. Analysis detected 743 faulty-reasoning hits from 370 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 94.9% and a BS Rank of 97% (736 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 96.60% of the article peer group.

Purdue Pharma officially ended operations Friday, a year after the Sackler family reached a $7.4 billion settlement with a coalition of state attorneys general, including New York's, for the company’s role in fueling the opioid crisis. 
“Under the Sacklers’ control, Purdue developed, manufactured and then misleadingly marketed its deadly opioids, destroying lives and communities across the country,” New York Attorney General Letitia James said in a written statement. 
“This company that put profits over people for decades is now shut down forever. 
As part of Purdue Pharma’s bankruptcy plan, the opioid manufacturing company will be replaced by public benefit corporation Knoa Pharma, which will continue producing medications, including opioids. 
Knoa’s net profits will fund state, local and tribal efforts to prevent opioid abuse, according to James' office. 
Knoa Pharma will not have any connection with any members of the Sackler family, as required by the settlement. 
However, the new company will receive all of Purdue's assets. 
Andrew Kolodny, an opioid researcher at Brandeis University, was critical of the deal. 
He said Purdue Pharma should have been forced to sell all of its assets to pay states for the costs of the opioid crisis and that the family should have been criminally charged. 
“The company should’ve been liquidated,” he said. 
“It’s a company that played a very large role in hundreds of thousands of deaths.” 
The settlement also required both Purdue Pharma and the Sacklers to give billions of dollars to support opioid addiction treatment across the country. 
New York has secured $250 million from the settlement with Purdue Pharma and the Sacklers, according to the attorney general’s office, along with $3 billion in additional funding from other opioid manufacturers and distributors. 
Purdue Pharma, which manufactures the pain medication OxyContin, first filed for bankruptcy in 2019 after agreeing to pay billions in a separate settlement for conspiring to sell opioids to patients who did not need the drugs. 
“This provides a measure of closure to a profoundly tragic chapter,” said Adam Koon, a public health professor at Georgetown University. 
“The focus must immediately shift from legal battles to providing the resources needed for community recovery." 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 14.6%Joe Hong: 1.3%Gothamist: 2.7%Confirmation Bias14.6%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 0.6%Gothamist: 1.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 13.8%Joe Hong: 2.8%Gothamist: 3.6%Availability Heuristic13.8%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 0.3%Gothamist: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 2.7%Joe Hong: 2.9%Gothamist: 0.7%Hindsight Bias2.7%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 0.6%Gothamist: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 8.1%Joe Hong: 3.5%Gothamist: 8.4%Framing Effect8.1%This article: 3.8%Joe Hong: 0.4%Gothamist: 1.2%Loss Aversion3.8%This article: 11.6%Joe Hong: 0.5%Gothamist: 1.1%Status Quo Bias11.6%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 11.9%Joe Hong: 2.6%Gothamist: 3.6%Optimism Bias11.9%This article: 1.9%Joe Hong: 1.4%Gothamist: 1.7%Pessimism Bias1.9%This article: 19.2%Joe Hong: 5.4%Gothamist: 8.5%Negativity Bias19.2%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 3.1%Gothamist: 2.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 17.6%Joe Hong: 1.1%Gothamist: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error17.6%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 0.0%Gothamist: 2.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 0.2%Gothamist: 2.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 1.0%Gothamist: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 13.5%Joe Hong: 0.6%Gothamist: 0.4%Primacy Effect13.5%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 0.3%Gothamist: 1.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 9.2%Joe Hong: 2.8%Gothamist: 4.4%Appeal to Authority9.2%This article: 4.3%Joe Hong: 0.8%Gothamist: 1.2%False Dilemma4.3%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 0.7%Gothamist: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 1.5%Gothamist: 3.8%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 22.2%Joe Hong: 4.0%Gothamist: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion22.2%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 9.7%Joe Hong: 2.4%Gothamist: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)9.7%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 8.9%Joe Hong: 0.8%Gothamist: 0.4%Burden of Proof8.9%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 4.1%Joe Hong: 1.6%Gothamist: 2.8%Anecdotal4.1%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.7%Joe Hong: 0.4%Gothamist: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.7%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 1.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 8.6%Joe Hong: 0.4%Gothamist: 1.2%Unattributed Quote8.6%This article: 3.8%Joe Hong: 0.8%Gothamist: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection3.8%This article: 4.3%Joe Hong: 1.5%Gothamist: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice4.3%This article: 4.3%Joe Hong: 1.1%Gothamist: 1.5%Indoctrination4.3%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 0.0%Gothamist: 1.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Hong: 0.2%Gothamist: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

370 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers51%attributed speech180writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageLetitia James • 32 words • 100.0% coverageLetitia James • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageJames' office • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageAndrew Kolodny • 33 words • 0.0% coverageAndrew Kolodny • 7 words • 0.0% coverageAndrew Kolodny • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageattorney general’s office • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageAdam Koon • 21 words • 0.0% coverageAdam Koon • 16 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Letitia James

100%flagged-word coverage
46 attributed words24% of attributed speech89% writer coverage
0%35.0%70.0%Unattributed Quote+69.6 ptsWriter: 0.0%Letitia James: 69.6%69.6%Quote-first Misdirection+30.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%Letitia James: 30.4%30.4%Biased Writer Voice-8.9 ptsWriter: 8.9%Letitia James: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.