Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 370 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Purdue Pharma results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Optimism Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 17.2% saturation with 255 hits . Analysis detected 1,387 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,480 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 70% (11,487 of 37,536 keywords). This Purdue Pharma is worse (more manipulative) than 69.40% of the peer group. Purdue Pharma
Keyword details
Total words: 1,480
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.4% percentile 3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 17.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 6.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 0.0% Primacy Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.4% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst