Speaker summary
70% 14 analyzed articles/videos 760.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Letitia James results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Appeal to Emotion , and Politically Left Leaning Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26.7% saturation with 261.596 hits . Analysis detected 2,145.708 faulty-reasoning hits from 760.333 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.4% and a BS Rank of 5% (27,061 of 28,364 speakers). This Letitia James is better (less manipulative) than 95.40% of the peer group. Letitia James
Speaker details
Total words: 760.333
Article count: 14
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 4.6% percentile 6.4% BS Score14 analyzed videos760.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 17.0% 17.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 15.0% 15.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 27.4% 27.4% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Speaker 12.1% 12.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 0.7% 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 26.7% 26.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 7.8% 7.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 1.4% 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 5.8% 5.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 27.4%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Speaker 15.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 26.7%, sitewide 19.2% Indoctrination: Speaker 17.0%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 2.0% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 1.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 6.7% Begging the Question: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 0.8% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 2.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 3.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst