Author summary
18%3 analyzed articles/videos3,261 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jon Brodkin results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 899 hits. Analysis detected 7,021 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,406 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 8% (5,780 of 6,244 authors). This Jon Brodkin is better (less manipulative) than 92.60% of the peer group.
Jon Brodkin
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
8%Jon Brodkin (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 12,406
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

7% percentile
02550751007.4% percentile
1.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles12.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.9%3.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.3%7.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.0%4.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.8%5.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.1%1.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Self-Serving Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate