Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 579 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Masciotra results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Politically Left Leaning Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.5% saturation with 1,763 hits . Analysis detected 11,817 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,054 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 57% (2,899 of 6,629 authors). This David Masciotra is worse (more manipulative) than 56.30% of the peer group. David Masciotra
Author details
Total words: 9,054
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.3% percentile 2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 19.5% 19.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 11.2% 11.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.5% 11.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 14.3% 14.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 19.5%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 11.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 14.3%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 11.2%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.4%, sitewide 0.8% Anecdotal: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Author 5.1%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst