Keyword summary
14% 11 analyzed articles/videos 11,194 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cooling Towers results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Framing Effect , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.6% saturation with 2,152 hits . Analysis detected 19,614 faulty-reasoning hits from 38,438 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 3% (36,627 of 37,536 keywords). This Cooling Towers is better (less manipulative) than 97.60% of the peer group. Cooling Towers
Keyword details
Total words: 38,438
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.4% percentile 1.2% BS Score11 analyzed articles38.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst